Age, Biography and Wiki

Paul Feeley was born on 27 July, 1910 in Des Moines, Iowa, U.S., is an American artist. Discover Paul Feeley's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 55 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Age 55 years old
Zodiac Sign Leo
Born 27 July, 1910
Birthday 27 July
Birthplace Des Moines, Iowa, U.S.
Date of death 10 June, 1966
Died Place New York, New York, U.S.
Nationality United States

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 27 July. He is a member of famous artist with the age 55 years old group.

Paul Feeley Height, Weight & Measurements

At 55 years old, Paul Feeley height not available right now. We will update Paul Feeley's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Paul Feeley Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Paul Feeley worth at the age of 55 years old? Paul Feeley’s income source is mostly from being a successful artist. He is from United States. We have estimated Paul Feeley's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income artist

Paul Feeley Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1910

Paul Feeley (July 27, 1910 − June 10, 1966) was an artist and director of the Art Department at Bennington College during the 1950s and early 1960s.

Though Feeley was born in the same generation as the Abstract Expressionists, his mature style was hardly gestural; instead, according to Feeley, his paintings "just sat still and had a presence rather than some sort of an agitated fit."

His greatest source of admiration was the Great Pyramids in Egypt.

Gene Baro stated that Feeley's mature style did not overtly depend on any contemporary art movements of the time.

His paintings are best summarized as follows:

"Primarily a painter, Feeley favored canvases in which simple geometric forms are deployed singly or in repeating groups. He used upright barbell or baluster shapes, oblongs that resemble peanuts, small solid-looking arches and wavy-countered squares and rectangles. Fascinated with modularity, Feeley often surrounded his forms with white bands and colored borders that echo the contours of the central shape. While the paint handling in his work is always restrained and stencils were used to repeat forms, Feeley is not a 'hard edge' painter; his geometry is too clearly of the handmade variety. The solid colors (predominantly red, blue, green, orange) are usually limited to two colors on a white ground, although the watercolors often use more hues per composition than the paintings."

1931

In 1931, Feeley moved to New York to pursue his studies.

He studied portrait painting with Cecilia Beaux, figure painting with George Bridgeman and Thomas Hart Benton, and mural painting from 1931-1934.

1934

In fact, in 1934, Feeley joined the Mural Painters Society of New York and became increasingly engaged with mural projects.

From 1934-1939, he would teach at the Cooper Union, where he'd later become the head of industrial design.

1940

In 1940, he would join the staff at Bennington College, where he was fundamental in establishing its art department.

1943

Aside from a brief hiatus from 1943-1946, when he volunteered for service with the United States Marines, he remained committed to the art of his contemporaries, he exposed his students — Helen Frankenthaler among them — to many of the most significant artists of his time.

1951

He helped to organize the first retrospective exhibition of modernist sculptor David Smith, in 1951 and helped with the 1955 Hans Hofmann and the 1952 Jackson Pollock retrospectives which were both organized by Clement Greenberg.

1954

Clement Greenberg included Feeley’s work in his exhibition Emerging Talent at the Kootz Gallery in 1954, alongside other Color-Field painters like Morris Louis and Kenneth Noland.

Critics have argued that his work is distinct from Color Field painting in its classical rigor and forms, whether derived from ancient Greek and Moorish decorative patterns or Cycladic and Egyptian statues.

Art critic Gene Baro argued that the Color Field classification was in certain ways inappropriate.

He saw Feeley's work as something wholly independent and not dialectically related to the Abstract Expressionist legacy - "in the way that Baroque art is remote from ancient Egyptian art and presumes different standards of value and habits of mind."

Paul Feeley’s early style has been compared to that of the Abstract Expressionists.

It was gestural, the painter’s hand was evident, many colors were present on the canvas at one time, and there was an overall abstraction of form.

1955

Lawrence Campbell, writing in 1955, described his paintings as “blobs elbowing each other and being rained on;” in one painting in particular Campbell described, “a strange red blob on a green ground successfully not looking like anything but itself.” This is his infamous “Red Blotch” from 1954.

Feeley himself saw this painting as a breakthrough: “So I suppose the reason that I can see that red and green picture as significant has to do with the absence of all those textural variations and all that brush dynamism.

I suppose in fact I just placed it, and didn’t do anything about the dynamic brush work, rather allowed the paint just to sit there.

With the red and green picture, I think I just sensed the shape of the canvas as an event, as against the notion of the canvas creating an arena for events.” At this point, his focus shifts away from paintings that project themselves onto their viewers and towards paintings that bring you in.

1960

Feeley was also an important Color Field painter and in the early 1960s he was included in the catalog and exhibition called Post-Painterly Abstraction organized by Clement Greenberg in 1964.

By 1960, Feeley was known for his use of unprimed canvas.

His style had also tightened up significantly, favoring clean lines and geometric forms over the more popular Pollock-inspired gestural style.

By this time, he had cut down on surface variations in his paintings to avoid light reflecting on different patches of paint.

Lawrence Alloway, in an interview with Feeley, recollects how Feeley described this change as “getting away from the madness, too much dynamic energy, of the earlier style.” At the same time, his use of color was also simplified, favoring only two to three colors per canvas.

Writing in 1960, Campbell explained the dichotomy present in Feeley’s paintings: “On the one hand, they are simple.

On the other, they suggest complicated theories, ideas and emotions.” He also suggests that Feeley’s forms are biomorphic, suggestive of “tiny living things greatly magnified.”

In the early to mid 1960s, Feeley continued to perfect his forms.

He makes greater use of negative space, isolating his quatrefoil and dumbbell shaped forms in the center of the canvas.

Judd explained how his paintings contained a “peculiar ornateness” that struck a balance between “being easily identified as ornate and Moorish and being thought something more new and interesting.”

1961

Feeley and Greenberg also organized a Kenneth Noland Exhibition at Bennington in 1961.

1962

Donald Judd reviewed a Paul Feeley show at Betty Parsons Gallery in 1962.

Judd noted how Feeley had improved his canvas staining technique: “Also, as before, both bright colors are stained into unprimed canvas.

This time the colors are opaque, fully intense and definitely opposed, and the edges are unbled, harder and often stressed by a narrow line of canvas.” These improvements clearly impressed Judd, who stated “The paintings are stronger than before and thorough…The greater scale, not size, since the painting is smaller than several others, adds considerable force and abstraction…The new scale makes the forms and the rectangle of the work more nearly identical, makes the painting more autonomous and exclusive.”

2002

Feeley had his first full scale retrospective (held posthumously) at the Matthew Marks Gallery, 2002 in New York City.

2015

In 2015 and 2016, the Albright Knox Art Gallery and Columbus Museum of Art held his first museum retrospective, titled "Imperfections by Chance: Paul Feeley Retrospective, 1956-1966."

His paintings are characterized by bright colors; simple, abstract forms; and symmetrically arranged, but serene, compositions.