Yuri Kholopov

Yuri Nikolaevich Kholopov (Ю́рий Никола́евич Холóпов, Yury Holopov; 14 August 1932, Ryazan – 24 April 2003, Moscow) was a Russian musicologist and educator.

After graduating from Ryazan Music Regional College he studied at the Moscow Conservatoire from 1949 to 1954 with Igor Sposobin and then with Semyon Bogatyrev, completing his master's degree in 1960.

He taught at the Tchaikovsky Conservatory Moscow since 1960, where he became a professor in 1983.

His teaching was highly influential for several generations of musicians.

He has written more than 1000 works (800 of which have been published), practically on all aspects of music theory.

Especially important were his textbooks of harmony (both theoretical and practical studies) which have been now commonly recognized in Russia as a standard of advanced music education.

Kholopov's political views and his ethical and aesthetic principles are formulated in a programmatic article about Edison Denisov:

"Denisov also became a witness of a really terrible epoch – the crash of Russia in 90es. Being far from a policy, he could not see, of course, everything that really occurred in his fatherland [...]. Nevertheless, it is quite sure, he would keep his ideological and artistic position and would resist to "democratic" tendencies of disintegration, amoralism, unscrupulousness and a profit cult. It is possible to draw an analogy between Denisov' position and that of Olivier Messiaen, when the last was imprisoned into a concentration camp. [...] Ethical and aesthetic principles of Denisov's personality concorded very well with his life, strong physical and mental health of that Siberian, with his kind smile, steady affability and correct manner, with normal human cheerfulness. Just imagine it: a man of 65, the world famous composer in his Moscow apartment with a young wife and two funny little girls, his daughters: that is a psychological paradigm of Denisov's music which was vitally normal, sincerely healthy, beautiful, refined, bright, inner steady" (Ju.

N. Kholopov.

Edison Denisov i muzika kontsa veka [Edison Denisov and music of the end of the century].

In: Svet.

Dobro.

Vechnost'.

Pamyati Edisona Denisova.

Stat’i.

Vospominaniya.

Dokumenti [Light.

Kindness.

Eternity.

Edison Denisov in memoriam.

Articles.

Recollections.

Materials], ed.

by V.Tsenova.

In 1963 he became a member of the Composers' Union of the USSR.

His important research of life and music of Anton von Webern was printed in two volumes in 1973 and 1975 (in collaboration with his sister, Valentina Kholopova).

He presented his PhD thesis in 1975 with a monograph Contemporary Aspects of Harmony in Music of Prokofiev printed earlier in 1967, and the Doctorate Degree thesis in 1977, with a monograph Essays in Contemporary Harmony printed in 1974.

Moscow, 1999, pp. 6–7).

Comment. All Kholopov's books are originally written in Russian

An attempt by Kholopov to upbuild a doctrine of the musical-historic process turned out unsuccessful.

It has been claimed that it is tautological, fantastic and even chimeric.

Шип 2013, p. 25: «Kholopovian formulation is depressing first of all by frank tautologihood: the rise "explained" as a movement from lower to higher.

Is discouraging also that the author does not disclose his understanding of "organization".He doesn't even put the question on the method of commensuration "organization" of different stages of movement "onward and upward".

Therefore also the idea that in the development of musical thinking is dominated the principle of rising, hangs in the air.

Even if the historic shift from "less organized" to "more organized" of music state actually exists, it is not clear exactly how it is due to the declared four pairs of opposites.

To this blurred picture of musical progress Kholopov added a hint-judgment about the 300-year periodic cycles in the history of music.

However, any arguments, or at least examples-illustrations, the author hasn't cited.

To voiced a fantastic statements musicologist added one more chimera.

(Холоповская формулировка удручает прежде всего откровенной тавтологичностью: подъем "разъясняется" как движение от низшего к высшему. Обескураживает и то, что автор никак не раскрывает своего понимания "организованности". Он даже не ставит вопрос о способе соизмерения "организованности" разных стадий движения "вперед и вверх". Поэтому и тезис о том, что в развитии музыкального мышления доминирует принцип подъема, повисает в воздухе. Если даже исторический переход от "менее организованного" к "более организованному" состоянию музыки на самом деле существует, то не ясно, как именно он обусловлен заявленными четырьмя парами противоположностей. К этой расплывчатой картине музыкального прогресса Холопов добавил суждение-намек о 300-летних периодических циклах в истории музыки. Однако никаких аргументов, или хотя бы примеров-иллюстраций автор не привел. К высказанным фантастическим положениям музыковед добавил еще одну химеру.)» An attempt to mitigate these rigid assessments of the concept was ended in recognition as a mythical this brave and unsuccessful storming the problem by Yuri Nikolayevich.

In propensity of Kholopov to the myth-making can make sure everyone, who read the fantastic chimera «rainbow spectrum of intervals» in Kholopov's definition of the natural harmonic series.