Age, Biography and Wiki

Yuri Kholopov was born on 14 August, 1932 in Russia, is an A 20th-century musicologist. Discover Yuri Kholopov's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 70 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Age 70 years old
Zodiac Sign Leo
Born 14 August, 1932
Birthday 14 August
Birthplace N/A
Date of death April 24, 2003, Moscow
Died Place N/A
Nationality Russia

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 14 August. He is a member of famous with the age 70 years old group.

Yuri Kholopov Height, Weight & Measurements

At 70 years old, Yuri Kholopov height not available right now. We will update Yuri Kholopov's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Yuri Kholopov Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Yuri Kholopov worth at the age of 70 years old? Yuri Kholopov’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from Russia. We have estimated Yuri Kholopov's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income

Yuri Kholopov Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1932

Yuri Nikolaevich Kholopov (Ю́рий Никола́евич Холóпов, Yury Holopov; 14 August 1932, Ryazan – 24 April 2003, Moscow) was a Russian musicologist and educator.

1949

After graduating from Ryazan Music Regional College he studied at the Moscow Conservatoire from 1949 to 1954 with Igor Sposobin and then with Semyon Bogatyrev, completing his master's degree in 1960.

1960

He taught at the Tchaikovsky Conservatory Moscow since 1960, where he became a professor in 1983.

His teaching was highly influential for several generations of musicians.

He has written more than 1000 works (800 of which have been published), practically on all aspects of music theory.

Especially important were his textbooks of harmony (both theoretical and practical studies) which have been now commonly recognized in Russia as a standard of advanced music education.

Kholopov's political views and his ethical and aesthetic principles are formulated in a programmatic article about Edison Denisov:

"Denisov also became a witness of a really terrible epoch – the crash of Russia in 90es. Being far from a policy, he could not see, of course, everything that really occurred in his fatherland [...]. Nevertheless, it is quite sure, he would keep his ideological and artistic position and would resist to "democratic" tendencies of disintegration, amoralism, unscrupulousness and a profit cult. It is possible to draw an analogy between Denisov' position and that of Olivier Messiaen, when the last was imprisoned into a concentration camp. [...] Ethical and aesthetic principles of Denisov's personality concorded very well with his life, strong physical and mental health of that Siberian, with his kind smile, steady affability and correct manner, with normal human cheerfulness. Just imagine it: a man of 65, the world famous composer in his Moscow apartment with a young wife and two funny little girls, his daughters: that is a psychological paradigm of Denisov's music which was vitally normal, sincerely healthy, beautiful, refined, bright, inner steady" (Ju.

N. Kholopov.

Edison Denisov i muzika kontsa veka [Edison Denisov and music of the end of the century].

In: Svet.

Dobro.

Vechnost'.

Pamyati Edisona Denisova.

Stat’i.

Vospominaniya.

Dokumenti [Light.

Kindness.

Eternity.

Edison Denisov in memoriam.

Articles.

Recollections.

Materials], ed.

by V.Tsenova.

1963

In 1963 he became a member of the Composers' Union of the USSR.

1973

His important research of life and music of Anton von Webern was printed in two volumes in 1973 and 1975 (in collaboration with his sister, Valentina Kholopova).

1975

He presented his PhD thesis in 1975 with a monograph Contemporary Aspects of Harmony in Music of Prokofiev printed earlier in 1967, and the Doctorate Degree thesis in 1977, with a monograph Essays in Contemporary Harmony printed in 1974.

1999

Moscow, 1999, pp. 6–7).

Comment. All Kholopov's books are originally written in Russian

An attempt by Kholopov to upbuild a doctrine of the musical-historic process turned out unsuccessful.

It has been claimed that it is tautological, fantastic and even chimeric.

2013

Шип 2013, p. 25: «Kholopovian formulation is depressing first of all by frank tautologihood: the rise "explained" as a movement from lower to higher.

Is discouraging also that the author does not disclose his understanding of "organization".He doesn't even put the question on the method of commensuration "organization" of different stages of movement "onward and upward".

Therefore also the idea that in the development of musical thinking is dominated the principle of rising, hangs in the air.

Even if the historic shift from "less organized" to "more organized" of music state actually exists, it is not clear exactly how it is due to the declared four pairs of opposites.

To this blurred picture of musical progress Kholopov added a hint-judgment about the 300-year periodic cycles in the history of music.

However, any arguments, or at least examples-illustrations, the author hasn't cited.

To voiced a fantastic statements musicologist added one more chimera.

(Холоповская формулировка удручает прежде всего откровенной тавтологичностью: подъем "разъясняется" как движение от низшего к высшему. Обескураживает и то, что автор никак не раскрывает своего понимания "организованности". Он даже не ставит вопрос о способе соизмерения "организованности" разных стадий движения "вперед и вверх". Поэтому и тезис о том, что в развитии музыкального мышления доминирует принцип подъема, повисает в воздухе. Если даже исторический переход от "менее организованного" к "более организованному" состоянию музыки на самом деле существует, то не ясно, как именно он обусловлен заявленными четырьмя парами противоположностей. К этой расплывчатой картине музыкального прогресса Холопов добавил суждение-намек о 300-летних периодических циклах в истории музыки. Однако никаких аргументов, или хотя бы примеров-иллюстраций автор не привел. К высказанным фантастическим положениям музыковед добавил еще одну химеру.)» An attempt to mitigate these rigid assessments of the concept was ended in recognition as a mythical this brave and unsuccessful storming the problem by Yuri Nikolayevich.

In propensity of Kholopov to the myth-making can make sure everyone, who read the fantastic chimera «rainbow spectrum of intervals» in Kholopov's definition of the natural harmonic series.