Age, Biography and Wiki

Stephen De Staebler was born on 24 March, 1933 in Webster Groves, Missouri, U.S., is an American sculptor, printmaker, and educator (1933 - 2011). Discover Stephen De Staebler's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 78 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation sculptor, ceramicist, educator
Age 78 years old
Zodiac Sign Aries
Born 24 March, 1933
Birthday 24 March
Birthplace Webster Groves, Missouri, U.S.
Date of death 2011
Died Place Berkeley, California, U.S.
Nationality United States

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 24 March. He is a member of famous sculptor with the age 78 years old group.

Stephen De Staebler Height, Weight & Measurements

At 78 years old, Stephen De Staebler height not available right now. We will update Stephen De Staebler's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Who Is Stephen De Staebler's Wife?

His wife is Dona Merced Curley (m. 1958–1996; death)

Family
Parents Herbert Conrad De Staebler (father)Juliette Hoiles De Staebler (mother)
Wife Dona Merced Curley (m. 1958–1996; death)
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Stephen De Staebler Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Stephen De Staebler worth at the age of 78 years old? Stephen De Staebler’s income source is mostly from being a successful sculptor. He is from United States. We have estimated Stephen De Staebler's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income sculptor

Stephen De Staebler Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1898

From an early age, he was encouraged to develop his artistic interests by his parents, Herbert Conrad De Staebler (1898–1963) and Juliette Hoiles De Staebler (1903–1950).

Many of De Staebler's childhood summers were spent on his maternal grandparents’ 775-acre farm in rural Shoals, Indiana.

1929

The lodging, which he shared with his mother and siblings, Herbert Conrad "Hobey" Jr. (1929–2008) and Juliette Jeanne "Jan" (1931–2006), was a rustic cabin built next to the bluffs of the White River.

This early immersion in the natural world shaped the artist's developing aesthetic.

De Staebler said, “I fell in love with the river that winds around our family farm in Indiana.

It is bordered by a bluff intricately carved by water and wind.

It has caves and natural stairways up fissures just wide enough to squeeze through.

I sometimes think that my impulses were all formed as a child there.”

When De Staebler was eight, his father met with the director of the St. Louis Art Museum to discuss his son's burgeoning art practice.

While at the museum, a bronze copy of the Hellenistic marble sculpture Laocoön and His Sons made an indelible impression on the young artist's psyche.

He subsequently signed up for painting lessons with Warren "Gus" Ludwig, an art professor of Washington University in St. Louis, and later took a private clay modeling class with Amanda Hawkins at John Burroughs School, a St. Louis prep school.

1933

Stephen De Staebler (March 24, 1933 – May 13, 2011) was an American sculptor, printmaker, and educator, he was best recognized for his work in clay and bronze.

Totemic and fragmented in form, De Staebler's figurative sculptures call forth the many contingencies of the human condition, such as resiliency and fragility, growth and decay, earthly boundedness and the possibility for spiritual transcendence.

An important figure in the California Clay Movement, he is credited with "sustaining the figurative tradition in post-World War II decades when the relevance and even possibility of embracing the human figure seemed problematic at best."

De Staebler was born in Webster Groves, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis, and spent his childhood in the nearby suburb of Kirkwood.

1950

De Staebler matriculated at Princeton University in 1950, where he studied archeology, art history and religion.

Joe Brown, a former professional boxer recognized for his sculptures of sports figures, served as De Staebler's mentor during this stage of his education.

Following his freshman year, De Staebler attended summer session at Black Mountain College in Black Mountain, North Carolina, where he studied with the social realist Ben Shahn.

Other guest faculty at this time included Robert Motherwell and David Tudor.

1952

In 1952, De Staebler traveled to Europe aboard the Greek freighter “The Atlantic Beacon.” Once in Europe, he visited cities across Italy (Genoa, Pisa, Sienna, Rome, Assisi, Padua, Venice, Ravenna, Florence, Milan), Switzerland (Berne and Basel), France (Paris, Chartres) and England (London) where he was exposed to canonical works of art and architecture, including Chartres Cathedral and iconic sculptures such as the Belvedere Torso in the Vatican Museums in Rome, Michelangelo's unfinished Captives at the Galleria dell'Accademia in Florence, the Rondanini Pietà at the Castello Sforzesco in Milan, the Winged Victory of Samothrace at the Louvre in Paris, and the Three Goddesses from the Parthenon at the British Museum in London.

Two years after this cultural pilgrimage, De Staebler graduated from Princeton magna cum laude with a degree in Religious Studies.

His senior thesis, “St. Francis of Assisi and His Imitation of Christ,” explored the life and work of the much venerated founder of the Franciscan Order.

In his obituary for the artist, art critic Kenneth Baker writes: “[De Staebler’s] academic study of religion at Princeton University gave him a philosophical grounding in the existentialist perspective on life to which he was temperamentally inclined.

‘We are all wounded survivors,’ he told an interviewer recently, ‘alive but devastated selves, fragmented, isolated – the condition of modern man.

Art tries to restructure reality so that we can live with the suffering’ ".

At the conclusion of his undergraduate studies, De Staebler was awarded a Fulbright Scholarship to Italy to study the connections between Benito Mussolini`s regime and the Vatican.

He ultimately declined the award and instead volunteered for United States Army, where he was trained in Teletype at stations in Hof an der Saale and West Berlin, Germany.

1957

In 1957, he attended ceramics classes at Brooklyn Museum Art School, studying under Ka Kwong Hui.

1961

Soon after returning to the States, De Staebler moved to the San Francisco Bay Area with his first wife, Dona Merced Curley, earning a teaching credential in secondary education followed by a master’s degree in fine art from University of California, Berkeley in 1961.

While at Berkeley, De Staebler studied under Peter Voulkos, a renowned abstract sculptor who flouted ceramic’s categorization as mere craft, elevating it to the realm of the fine arts.

Voulkos’ emphasis on clay's organic properties and expressive potential deeply influenced De Staebler and reactivated his childhood affinity for nature.

De Staebler's ceramic sculptures harness the inherent qualities of clay, his primary medium during the earlier years of his career, to create raw, fragmented indexes of the body, the landscape and even the landscape as body.

The equally organic and preternatural qualities of his forms evoke the tenuous relationships between earthly monumentality and spiritual transcendence, fragmentation and wholeness, and fragility and strength.

This tendency for slippage serves a productive purpose, allowing the works to inhabit the discursive space between more prescriptive categories.

Seated Figure with Yellow Flame, in the collection of the Smithsonian American Art Museum is a typical example of his anthropomorphic works.

Donald Kuspit observes how De Stabeler's art can be seen as:

“an attempt to strip the human figure down to its most elemental, ‘almost simplistic,’ terms, revealing it in all its archaic bodiliness.

He wants to disinter it from its modernity – the sense of its purely functional significance, of its ideal existence as that of a happy machine – and recover a sense of its flesh as morbidly immediate if also cosmic in import, linked to the strange tumult of raw matter in formation.” He goes on to describe how De Staebler seeks “to create a modern religious art, utilizing archaic forms for an ‘archaic’ purpose: the articulation and remediation of suffering.

This generates the illusion of release from time and space we call ‘eternity.’ De Staebler's archaic figure symbolizes the process that leads to the eternal effect – that uncovers the eternal presentness of the primitively memorable – and the effect itself.

It is about the impacted sublimity of our feelings for those we cherish, most of all, for ourselves.”