Age, Biography and Wiki

Stefan Nystrom was born on 31 December, 1973 in Sweden, is a Stefan Nystrom was long time resident of. Discover Stefan Nystrom's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 50 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Age 50 years old
Zodiac Sign Capricorn
Born 31 December, 1973
Birthday 31 December
Birthplace Sweden
Nationality Sweden

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 31 December. He is a member of famous with the age 50 years old group.

Stefan Nystrom Height, Weight & Measurements

At 50 years old, Stefan Nystrom height not available right now. We will update Stefan Nystrom's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Stefan Nystrom Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Stefan Nystrom worth at the age of 50 years old? Stefan Nystrom’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from Sweden. We have estimated Stefan Nystrom's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income

Stefan Nystrom Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook Stefan Nystrom Facebook
Wikipedia Stefan Nystrom Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1973

Nystrom was born on 31 December 1973 in Sweden.

His mother, an Australian permanent resident, was visiting her parents in Sweden in the late stages of her pregnancy.

She arrived back in Australia with Stefan when he was just 27 days old.

Since then he lived all his life in Australia, never leaving the country, and he speaks only English.

2004

By 2004, aged 30, he had committed a large number of offences (many when a minor under 18) "including aggravated rape of a 10-year-old boy and armed robbery"

and was once again in jail for a serious criminal offence.

The Australian Immigration Minister, Amanda Vanstone, under Section 501 of the Migration Act, cancelled his visa in 2004 on the grounds of his bad character, had him imprisoned and sought to deport him to Sweden.

2005

However, she was stopped in 2005 by the Federal Court, whose majority judgement (by 2 out of 3) read: "[Mr Nystrom] has indeed behaved badly, but no worse than many of his age who have also lived as members of the Australian community all their lives but who happen to be citizens. The difference is the barest of technicalities" ... "Apart from the dire punishment of the individual involved, it presumes that Australia can export its problems elsewhere".

As an aside to the main point, some controversy was raised by the Federal Court of Australia judges saying "... but no worse than many of his age".

However, according to the same court, his crimes included aggravated rape (at age 16) of a 10-year-old child and armed robbery (at age 11), and one judge noted "the appellant is a thoroughly unpleasant man having been convicted of serious and odious crimes".

This has been an opportunity for some to castigate judges for being out of touch.

2006

Stefan Nystrom was a long-time resident of Australia who was deported to Sweden in 2006.

The Australian Government appealed to the High Court of Australia, where a panel of five judges gave their decision on 8 November 2006 that despite Nystrom having an "absorbed person visa", Senator Vanstone could cancel his visa and deport him on character grounds.

Two judges noted that Parliament had left the Immigration Minister with the discretion to decide whether a person such as Nystrom could remain in Australia.

Despite this, Senator Vanstone said her department was now "obliged" to detain Nystrom and "facilitate his removal".

Nystrom was re-arrested on 10 November 2006 and held in Maribyrnong Immigration Detention Centre in Melbourne.

On 22 December, with the assistance of the Human Rights Law Resource Centre, he petitioned the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) to prevent his deportation.

The Committee declined his request for an interim measure to halt his deportation while his case was being decided.

He was deported on 27 December 2006, arriving in Sweden on 29 December 2006.

It would appear that the High Court decision, and the dissenting Federal Court judge's opinion, was that technically whilst the Immigration Minister has the power to deport any non-citizen on grounds of bad character, she should not do so in Nystrom's case.

All three Federal Court judges were unanimous in their criticism of Senator Vanstone in this case.

2011

He won a landmark decision at the United Nations in 2011, establishing that non-citizens may also have the right to enter a country.

In July 2011, after a 4.5 year delay, the UNHRC, which monitors compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), determined that Australia had violated Nystrom's right to enter his own country (art. 12(4)) and his right to family (articles 17 & 23(1)).

In finding that the right to enter one's own country can apply also to non-citizens, Nystrom v Australia "unequivocally establish[es] that an individual may be able to claim protection against arbitrary deportation by a state party even though he or she is not a citizen of that state."

Further, there are unlikely to be any circumstances in which expulsion from one's country can be "anything other than arbitrary."

Australia has a legal obligation to remedy its breach of the ICCPR and, in the HRC's view, it should allow and 'materially facilitate' Nystrom's return to Australia.

2012

However, in April 2012 the Australian Government advised the HRC that it "respectfully disagrees" with the committee and said that it will not allow Nystrom to re-enter Australia.

Barrister Brian Walters, who acted pro bono for Nystrom, stated the Government's decision could damage international relations and that Sweden had originally requested Australia not to deport Nystrom on humanitarian grounds.

Other prominent immigration cases in Australia: