Age, Biography and Wiki
Reynald Secher was born on 27 October, 1955 in Nantes, France, is an A 20th-century french historian. Discover Reynald Secher's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is she in this year and how she spends money? Also learn how she earned most of networth at the age of 68 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
68 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Scorpio |
Born |
27 October, 1955 |
Birthday |
27 October |
Birthplace |
Nantes, France |
Nationality |
France
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 27 October.
She is a member of famous historian with the age 68 years old group.
Reynald Secher Height, Weight & Measurements
At 68 years old, Reynald Secher height not available right now. We will update Reynald Secher's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about She's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Husband |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Reynald Secher Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Reynald Secher worth at the age of 68 years old? Reynald Secher’s income source is mostly from being a successful historian. She is from France. We have estimated Reynald Secher's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
historian |
Reynald Secher Social Network
Timeline
"Many 'progressive' thinkers and historians still approve or justify the anti-religious fervor of the revolutionaries. They are thus challenged by a recent discovery made by a 32-year-old historian, Reynald Secher. Secher presented a remarkable doctoral thesis at the Sorbonne, subtitled 'The Franco-French Genocide.' His thesis demonstrates that the inhabitants of the Vendée region, after they surrendered to the Republic armies in 1793, were systematically exterminated in 1794 by order of the convention led by Robespierre. About 117,000 civilians—including women, and children—were massacred, in order that the 'race' of Vendeans be obliterated as a hindrance to the progress of the Revolution."
However, Secher's estimate of the Vendéan casualties was criticised by historians such as Charles Tilly and Michel Vovelle due to objections to Secher's methodology.
Tilly accused Secher of using "dubious methods to estimate the losses of population and housing attributable to the counterrevolution and its repression".
François Lebrun has argued for a figure of 150,000 rebel dead, while Jean-Clément Martin estimated rebel casualties as numbering between 220,000 and 250,000.
Donald Sutherland of the University of Maryland claimed that Secher's figures have been superseded by the research of Jacques Hussenet, who calculated losses of 165,000.
Sutherland also argued that the repression of the Vendéans did not constitute a genocide and that Secher showed "an eye-popping gullibility in crediting every anti-republican atrocity story he can find".
Reynald Secher (born 27 October 1955) is a French historian famous for his work on the War in the Vendée.
Under the supervision of Jean Meyer at the Paris-Sorbonne University, Secher wrote a history of his home town, La Chapelle-Basse-Mer.
His thesis on the revolt in the Vendée ('Contribution à l'étude du génocide Franco-français: la Vendée-Vengé') won him a Doctorat d'État.
These were both published in 1986.
His argument that the suppression of the revolt in the Vendée by the Revolutionary government constituted a genocide was controversial.
Reviewers denounced Secher as anti-revolutionary and anti-republican.
Laurent Ladouce described the debate: