Age, Biography and Wiki
Raymond Boucher (Raymond Paul Boucher) was born on 31 July, 1957 in Tyngsborough, Massachusetts, U.S., is an American trial attorney. Discover Raymond Boucher's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 66 years old?
| Popular As |
Raymond Paul Boucher |
| Occupation |
Trial attorney |
| Age |
66 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Leo |
| Born |
31 July, 1957 |
| Birthday |
31 July |
| Birthplace |
Tyngsborough, Massachusetts, U.S. |
| Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 31 July.
He is a member of famous attorney with the age 66 years old group.
Raymond Boucher Height, Weight & Measurements
At 66 years old, Raymond Boucher height not available right now. We will update Raymond Boucher's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Wife |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Raymond Boucher Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Raymond Boucher worth at the age of 66 years old? Raymond Boucher’s income source is mostly from being a successful attorney. He is from United States. We have estimated Raymond Boucher's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
attorney |
Raymond Boucher Social Network
Timeline
Represented family members in suit against law firm that drafted a partnership agreement which damaged the family business.
Raymond Paul Boucher (born July 31, 1957 in Tyngsborough, Massachusetts) is an American trial attorney.
Throughout his career, Boucher has represented clients in a wide range of matters including consumer litigation, construction defect litigation, product liability, toxic tort litigation and employment discrimination.
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree with a double major in business administration and political science from Fort Lewis College in 1980, his Master of Science degree in management from Colorado State University in 1981, and his Juris Doctor degree from Pepperdine University School of Law in 1984.
He was admitted to the California State Bar in 1984.
During his time at Fort Lewis College in Durango Colorado, he was elected as student body president for two consecutive years, making him the first student to hold the position twice in the school's history.
In 1984, he graduated from Pepperdine and ranked in the top fifteen percentile of his class.
Co., 934 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1991)].
Suit to recover for fraud in the sale of a small business.
[https://casetext.com/case/ileto-v-glock-2 Ileto v. Glock, Inc., 421 F. Supp.
[http://openjurist.org/934/f2d/203/harrell-v-20th-century-insurance-company Harrell v. 20th Century Ins.
Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, 998 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1993).
Suit involving unconstitutional employment discrimination based upon national origin.
He was recognized with the University's Distinguished Alumnus Award in 2002 and serves as a member on the Pepperdine Law School Board of Visitors.
In 2005, Boucher was honored with an Honorary Doctor of Law by Whittier College School of Law in Costa Mesa, California.
He has been recognized as a Top Leading Lawyer in America by Lawdragon and named Trial Lawyer of the Decade by the Los Angeles Daily Journal.
Mr. Carrey was sued by ex girlfriend husband and Mother.
Mr Boucher was able to dismiss charges.
2d 127 (C.D. Cal. 2006)].
Action against weapons manufacturers Glock and China North, whose firearms were used by a member of the Aryan Nation to shoot several children and kill a postal worker.
He served as lead attorney in the landmark $660-million sexual-abuse settlement with the Catholic archdiocese where he represented over 250 abuse victims in the July 2007 settlement.
He was able to help secure over one billion dollars in recovery for victims of abuse by Catholic Priests in Southern California.
In 2007, Fort Lewis College named him Alumnus of the Year.
During his time at Colorado State, Boucher was a member of the Sigma Iota Epsilon and also was a member of the CSV rugby team.
After obtaining his management degree, Boucher attended Pepperdine University to work on his Juris Doctor.
During his time in law school, Boucher was a member of the Phi Delta Phi honor society and competed in the annual Moot Court competition where he ended up placing first.
In 2010, Boucher traveled to Masindi, Uganda where he, and colleagues spearheaded Project Masindi, an operation to help African teenage boys, and girls who were detained in a Ugandan detention center while they awaited trial for accused crimes.
In addition to his legal career Boucher is involved with state, and national politics, helping to raise funds and providing strategic analysis for various political campaigns.
He was a past president of the Consumer Attorneys of California and of the Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, and a recipient of the California League of Conservation Voters' award for his work in helping to build a green California for future generations.
Boucher is the second of eight children.
[http://www.nkms.com/collegeblog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Regent1.pdf Regents of University of California v. Superior Court (2010) 183 Cal. App.
Callahan v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (2011) 194 Cal. App.
Quesada v. Herb Thyme Farms, Inc. __ Cal. __ (2015)
California Supreme Court determines state law claims brought by consumers alleging produce is being intentionally mislabeled as organic are not preempted by federal law.
