Age, Biography and Wiki
Noam Braslavsky was born on 1961 in Israel, is an Israeli artist and curator. Discover Noam Braslavsky's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 63 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
63 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
N/A |
Born |
1961 |
Birthday |
|
Birthplace |
Israel |
Nationality |
Israel
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on .
He is a member of famous artist with the age 63 years old group.
Noam Braslavsky Height, Weight & Measurements
At 63 years old, Noam Braslavsky height not available right now. We will update Noam Braslavsky's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Noam Braslavsky Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Noam Braslavsky worth at the age of 63 years old? Noam Braslavsky’s income source is mostly from being a successful artist. He is from Israel. We have estimated Noam Braslavsky's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
artist |
Noam Braslavsky Social Network
Timeline
Noam Braslavsky (born 1961) is an Israeli artist and curator who lives and works in Berlin.
Noam Brasklavsky was born in Poria Illit, Israel.
In the early 1980s, Braslavsky studied at the Bezalel Academy of Art and Design in Jerusalem, subsequently studying Film at the Beit Zvi acting school in Ramat Gan and completing his Master of Fine Arts at the Multimedia Department of the Düsseldorf Art Academy with Nam June Paik/Nan Hoover.
In the 1980s and 1990s he created manipulative, interactive room installations, which he displayed in dark or black rooms (he speaks of “black cubes" in contrast to the usual white cubes). "Shelter" (concrete, steel, glass, Plexiglas and sea-shells) was set on fire in an act of sabotage years later at his solo exhibition "Magic as Existential Need" in Tel Aviv; only the steel frame and the concrete pedestals survived.
Braslavsky’s works are traps that take their cues from sacred architecture, nature and society.
He analyzes manipulative mechanisms that influence and control the human psyche, translating them in simplified form into rooms.
Some examples are artificial wombs, purring machines, compulsive hats, labyrinths and enormous cocoons.
One of his early works (1984) explores the abolition of space and the dissolution of its boundaries, and can also be seen as a sort of virtual (miniature) stage for his subsequent creative work.
"Blue" is a second head, a perceptual fuelling station that supplies nothing but pure blue light, suspending the perception of space for a time while promoting pure vision.
In 2003 Braslavsky founded GdK (Galerie der Künste) in Berlin, shortly thereafter establishing the eponymous art association together with his wife Emma Braslavsky.
On 21 October 2010, Braslavsky unveiled a life-sized sculpture of former Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, who was in a persistent vegetative state after suffering a stroke in 2006, in a hospital bed with an IV drip at the Kishon Gallery in Tel Aviv.
Knesset member Yoel Hasson described the work as “sickening voyeurism”, and Ronit Tirosh declared in the Knesset: “This is not art!” Menachem Wecker of the Houston Chronicle wrote: “But it will be interesting to see how viewers respond to the work.
Will it be perceived as a piñata or a voodoo doll, or will it create a safe (aesthetic) space where viewers can transcend clichéd, extremist political discourse and use art as a medium to consider the man himself as he lies on what is almost certainly his death bed?”