Age, Biography and Wiki
Lani Guinier (Carol Lani Guinier) was born on 19 April, 1950 in New York City, U.S., is an American legal scholar and civil rights theorist (1950–2022). Discover Lani Guinier's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is she in this year and how she spends money? Also learn how she earned most of networth at the age of 71 years old?
Popular As |
Carol Lani Guinier |
Occupation |
Attorney · Author · Law professor |
Age |
71 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Aries |
Born |
19 April, 1950 |
Birthday |
19 April |
Birthplace |
New York City, U.S. |
Date of death |
7 January, 2022 |
Died Place |
Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 19 April.
She is a member of famous Attorney with the age 71 years old group.
Lani Guinier Height, Weight & Measurements
At 71 years old, Lani Guinier height not available right now. We will update Lani Guinier's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Who Is Lani Guinier's Husband?
Her husband is Nolan Bowie (m. 1986)
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Husband |
Nolan Bowie (m. 1986) |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Lani Guinier Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Lani Guinier worth at the age of 71 years old? Lani Guinier’s income source is mostly from being a successful Attorney. She is from United States. We have estimated Lani Guinier's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
Attorney |
Lani Guinier Social Network
Timeline
Ewart, who was born in Panama to Jamaican parents and raised in Panama and Boston, was one of two black students admitted to Harvard College in 1929.
He was forced to drop out in 1931, unable to afford school after he was excluded from financial aid and campus housing, but he ultimately returned to Harvard as a professor and the first chair of the Afro-American Studies Department in 1969.
Paprin, an Ashkenazi-Jewish civil-rights activist, graduated from Hunter College in 1939.
Guinier's parents met in Hawaii Territory, where each was a member of the Communist Party of Hawaii and of the Hawaii Civil Rights Congress.
Guinier's father was also a national officer for the United Public Workers of America, a Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) union.
Her uncle was real estate developer and social activist Maurice Paprin.
Carol Lani Guinier (April 19, 1950 – January 7, 2022) was an American educator, legal scholar, and civil rights theorist.
She was the Bennett Boskey Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, and the first woman of color appointed to a tenured professorship there.
Carol Lani Guinier was born on April 19, 1950, in New York City, to Eugenia "Genii" Paprin and Ewart Guinier.
Guinier moved with her family to Hollis, Queens, in 1956.
Guinier said that she wanted to be a civil rights lawyer since she was twelve years old, after she watched on television as Constance Baker Motley helped escort James Meredith, the first black American to enroll in the University of Mississippi.
After graduating third in her class from Andrew Jackson High School, Guinier earned her B.A. from Radcliffe College in 1971 and her J.D. degree from Yale Law School in 1974.
She clerked for Judge Damon Keith of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, then served as special assistant to Assistant Attorney General Drew S. Days in the Civil Rights Division during the Carter Administration.
She was admitted to the District of Columbia Bar in 1981, and after Ronald Reagan took office, she joined the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) as an assistant counsel, eventually becoming head of its Voting Rights project.
She was a highly successful litigator for LDF, winning 31 of the 32 cases she argued.
She also worked on the successful extension of the Voting Rights Act in 1982.
In 1993 President Bill Clinton nominated Guinier to be United States Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, but withdrew the nomination.
Guinier was President Bill Clinton's nominee for Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights in April 1993.
Conservative journalists and Republican senators mounted a campaign against Guinier's nomination.
Guinier was dubbed a "quota queen," a phrase first used in a Wall Street Journal op-ed by Clint Bolick, a Reagan-era U.S. Justice Department official.
The term was perceived by some to be racially loaded, combining the "welfare queen" stereotype with "quota," a buzzword used to challenge affirmative action.
In fact, Guinier opposed racial quotas, as she attempted to make clear, responding to the misrepresentation of her views by invoking her father's experience at Harvard: "He was a victim of a racial quota, a quota of one. I have never been in favor of quotas. I could not be, knowing my father's experience."
As one reviewer of her work wrote: "The remedies Guinier advocates for diluted minority voting rights do not include laws that guarantee election outcomes for disadvantaged groups."
Some journalists also alleged that Guinier's writings indicated that she supported the shaping of electoral districts to ensure a black majority, a process known as "race-conscious districting."
Political science and law professor Carol M. Swain argued that Guinier was in favor of "segregating black voters in black-majority districts."
Guinier was portrayed as a racial polarizer who believed—in the words of George Will—that "only blacks can properly represent blacks."
In the face of the negative media attention, many Democratic senators, including David Pryor of Arkansas, Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, and Carol Moseley-Braun of Illinois (the only African American serving in the Senate at that time), informed Clinton that Guinier's interviews with senators were going poorly and urged him to withdraw Guinier's nomination.
Clinton withdrew Guinier's nomination on June 4, 1993.
He stated that Guinier's writings "clearly lend themselves to interpretations that do not represent the views I expressed on civil rights during the [presidential] campaign."
Guinier, for her part, acknowledged that her writings were often "unclear and subject to vastly different interpretations," but believed that the political attacks had distorted and caricatured her academic philosophies.
William T. Coleman Jr., who had served as Secretary of Transportation under President Gerald Ford, wrote that the withdrawal was "a grave [loss], both for President Clinton and the country. The President's yanking of the nomination, caving in to shrill, unsubstantiated attacks, was not only unfair, but some would say political cowardice."
In her publications, Guinier suggested various strategies for strengthening minority groups' voting power, and rectifying what she characterized as an unfair voting system, not just for racial minorities, but for all numerical minority groups, including fundamentalist Christians, the Amish, or, in states such as Alabama, Democrats.
Guinier also stated that she did not advocate for any single procedural rule, but rather that all alternatives should be considered in the context of litigation "after the court finds a legal violation."
Some of the ideas she considered are:
Guinier's idea of cumulative voting was taken up by Roslyn Fuller as a potential way of protecting minority rights without compromising One Man, One Vote principles.
Before coming to Harvard in 1998, Guinier taught at the University of Pennsylvania Law School for ten years.
Her scholarship covered the professional responsibilities of public lawyers, the relationship between democracy and the law, the role of race and gender in the political process, college admissions, and affirmative action.
From 2001 until her death, Guinier was active in civil rights in higher education, coining the term "confirmative action" to reconceptualize issues of diversity, fairness, and affirmative action.
The process of confirmative action, she said, "ties diversity to the admissions criteria for all students, whatever their race, gender, or ethnic background—including people of color, working-class whites, and even children of privilege."
Because public and private institutions of higher learning are almost all to some extent publicly funded (i.e., federal student loans and research grants), Guinier argued that the nation has a vested interest in seeing that all students have access to higher education and that these graduates "contribute as leaders in our democratic polity."