Age, Biography and Wiki
Juan Rivera (Juan A. Rivera Jr.) was born on 31 October, 1972 in Puerto Rico, is an American man wrongfully convicted three times. Discover Juan Rivera's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 51 years old?
Popular As |
Juan A. Rivera Jr. |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
51 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Scorpio |
Born |
31 October, 1972 |
Birthday |
31 October |
Birthplace |
Puerto Rico |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 31 October.
He is a member of famous with the age 51 years old group.
Juan Rivera Height, Weight & Measurements
At 51 years old, Juan Rivera height not available right now. We will update Juan Rivera's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Who Is Juan Rivera's Wife?
His wife is Melissa Sanders-Rivera (m. 2000)
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Melissa Sanders-Rivera (m. 2000) |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Juan Rivera Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Juan Rivera worth at the age of 51 years old? Juan Rivera’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from United States. We have estimated Juan Rivera's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
Juan Rivera Social Network
Timeline
Juan A. Rivera Jr. (born October 31, 1972) is an American man who was wrongfully convicted three times for the 1992 rape and murder of 11-year-old Holly Staker in Waukegan, Illinois.
He was convicted twice on the basis of a confession that he said was coerced.
No physical evidence linked him to the crime scene.
On August 17, 1992, police received a call from a woman in Waukegan, Illinois, who reported that the babysitter for her two children, 11-year-old Holly Staker, was missing and the back door to the apartment had been kicked in.
Staker's partially clothed body was found on the floor of the children's bedroom.
She had been raped, stabbed 27 times, and strangled.
Vaginal and anal swabs tested positive for semen.
Evidence technicians took fingerprints and blood samples found in the bedroom and near the kitchen sink, where it appeared someone had washed blood off their hands.
On September 29, 1992, police received a tip from a prison inmate that another inmate, Puerto Rican-born Juan Rivera, believed he knew who killed Staker.
According to the informant, Rivera told him he was at a party that night near the crime scene and saw a man acting suspiciously.
Rivera was described by the police as friendly and cooperative when he was interviewed and agreed to provide samples of his blood and hair.
He told police he was at a party near the crime scene, when another man, whom he identified as Robert Hurley, left the party more than once before later returning sweaty, out of breath, and with a fresh scratch.
Further investigation revealed there was no party at the residence on August 17, leading to greater suspicion of Rivera.
Rivera was questioned for many hours over the course of several days and eventually admitted to killing Staker.
Following the confession, jail personnel saw Rivera, who had a history of mental illness, beating his head against the wall of his cell.
A prison nurse determined that Rivera was in an acute psychotic state and was "not in touch with the reality of what was going on around him".
Several hours later, detectives entered the room Rivera was in and had him sign the summary account taken by detectives.
Detectives reviewed the statement and agreed that many details given by Rivera were inconsistent with the known facts of the crime; it was decided that two other members of the Task Force would re-interview Rivera to try to clear up these "inconsistencies".
Rivera's mental state had not improved by the time the next interview was to take place, so he was placed in heavy restraints and a prison psychiatrist prescribed Haldol, Cogentin, and Ativan.
The prosecution had tried to enter these into evidence in 1993.
The shoes had Staker's blood on them, but the prosecution withdrew the evidence prior to Rivera's first trial when they learned that the shoes had not been available for sale anywhere in the United States until after the murder.
The DNA has yet to be matched to an individual, but it has been linked to DNA from the scene of a home invasion and murder in 2000 in Chicago by three men.
Only one man of the three has been identified; he was convicted of that crime and is in prison.
He claims to have been wrongfully convicted.
Following his exoneration, Rivera sued the city of Waukegan and Lake County; he was awarded $20 million, at its time, the largest wrongful conviction settlement in United States history.
This amount included $2 million from John E. Reid & Associates.
Rivera was given two polygraph examinations by a Reid employee.
He was reported as exhibiting general deception during the examination and subsequently admitted that he did lie to the test question about his alibi, but continued to deny any involvement in the death of Holly Staker.
Over the next several days he was interrogated by law enforcement.
DNA testing done in 2004 on semen taken from the crime scene ruled out Rivera as the source.
However, the prosecution argued that Staker had been sexually active and the semen sample came from her previous consensual sex with another man.
Rivera was convicted a third time.
His conviction was overturned by the appellate court.
Because the court ruled that there had been insufficient evidence adduced at trial to sustain a conviction, the Double Jeopardy Clause barred prosecutors from retrying Rivera.
He was released from prison after serving 20 years.
After his release, Rivera's attorneys asked the courts to order genetic testing on Rivera's shoes.
DNA testing conducted on the shoes in 2014 indicated that the blood belonged to Staker, but it also contained another genetic sample.
The DNA in this matched the semen sample from Staker.
Rivera's defense team insists that this is proof not only that the blood was planted, but that the real killer's DNA was inadvertently planted as well.
In 2015 he received a $20 million settlement from Lake County, Illinois for wrongful conviction, formerly the largest settlement of its kind in United States history.