Age, Biography and Wiki
Gordon van Haarlem was born on 26 July, 1956, is a Gordon John van Haarlem is Canadian outlaw. Discover Gordon van Haarlem's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 67 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
67 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Leo |
Born |
26 July, 1956 |
Birthday |
26 July |
Birthplace |
N/A |
Nationality |
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 26 July.
He is a member of famous with the age 67 years old group.
Gordon van Haarlem Height, Weight & Measurements
At 67 years old, Gordon van Haarlem height not available right now. We will update Gordon van Haarlem's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Gordon van Haarlem Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Gordon van Haarlem worth at the age of 67 years old? Gordon van Haarlem’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from . We have estimated Gordon van Haarlem's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
Gordon van Haarlem Social Network
Instagram |
|
Linkedin |
|
Twitter |
|
Facebook |
|
Wikipedia |
|
Imdb |
|
Timeline
Gordon John van Haarlem (born 26 July 1956) is a Canadian outlaw biker who was one of the "Port Hope 8" tried in one of the most controversial trials in Canadian history.
Born in Peterborough into a working class Dutch-Canadian family, van Haarlem joined Satan's Choice Motorcycle Club as a teenager.
He worked as a welder at construction sits.
By age of 23, van Haarlem had a lengthy criminal record with convictions for assault, mischief, possession of an unregistered gun, theft, possession of narcotic, and possession of narcotics with the intention of trafficking.
HIs nickname of "Dog Map" was originally "Dog Face", a moniker given in irony as "Dog Face" suggested that he was ugly, but in fact van Haarlem was considered to be handsome.
The nickname became "Dog Map" as given to him by Gary Comeau in reference to his tendency to take winding routes in riding his motorcycle across the countryside.
Van Haarlem was known as a fighter within Satan's Choice, and had his nose broken a number of times.
He often stayed in Port Hope where he served as a babysitter for another Satan's Choice biker, Richard Sauvé when Sauvé and his wife went to concerts in Toronto.
On 18 October 1978, Lorne Campbell shot and killed William "Heavy" Matiyek at the Queen's Hotel in Port Hope shortly before 11 pm.
On the same night, Sergeant Samuel McReelis of the Port Hope police arrived at the Queen's Hotel as the lead investigator.
On 5 December 1978, van Haarlem was arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit murder in connection with the death of Matiyek.
The charges promoted astonishment from the other bikers present at the Queen's Hotel as van Haarlem was not at the Queen's Hotel on the night of the murder.
The journalist Paul Dalby wrote it was odd that van Haarlem was charged as he had an "airtight alibi".
The fact that Mitchell had only come forward to the police on Christmas Day 1978-two months after the murder-did not help her credibility along with the fact that she could not remember on the stand when she came forward to the police as she stated she "might" had done so a week after the murder, but was not certain on that point.
Ebbs in his cross-examination of Mitchell forced her to concede that her memory was unreliable as she testified that she saw van Haarlem wear the patch of a "striker" in Satan's Choice in September 1978 when he was already a "full patch" member.
Mitchell admitted that she often confused van Haarlem with Thomas "Tommy the Retard" Horner, but stated that it did not matter as both van Haarlem and Horner were Satan's Choice bikers.
In his defense, van Haarlem took the stand to testify he had been in Port Hope on 17 October 1978 serving as a babysitter for Sauvé and had returned to Peterborough the next day.
He testified that on the night of the murder he had been drinking at the King George Hotel from 8:30 pm to 1:30 am.
A number of witnesses testified that they had seen van Haarlem at the King George Hotel at the time that he claimed to have been there.
It was a hour's drive from Peterborough to Port Hope, it was not possible for van Haarlem to disappear from the King George Hotel for two hours without paying his tab at the bar.
The Crown Attorney prosecuting the case, Chris Meinhardt, was unable to present any evidence beyond the testimony of Mitchell that van Haarlem was at the Queen's Hotel on 18 October 1978 and his thesis for the guilt of van Haarlem consisted of bringing up his extensive criminal record, which filled an entire page of the trial transcript.
In his final submission to the jury, Ebbs noted that numerous witnesses confirmed van Haarlem's alibi while the Crown's only evidence for his guilt was the testimony of Mitchell which was confused on a number of points.
On 23 February 1979 at the preliminary hearing, Ebbs made an alibi defense as he called two witnesses who both stated that van Haarlem was drinking at the King George Hotel in Peterborough on the night of 18 October 1978 and was not in Port Hope as the Crown had claimed.
One bouncer at the King George Hotel testified that van Haarlem had been wearing his club colors on the night of 18 October, leading to him to ask van Haarlem to put away his gang colors as the King George Hotel did not permit the wearing of gang colors.
On 19 March 1979, Justice Scullion ruled that the Crown had presented enough evidence to bring charges of first degree murder against van Haarlem.
While awaiting his trial, van Haarlem was denied bail and held at the Peterborough jail.
On 26 July 1979, his girlfriend Patricia gave birth to his daughter Amber.
His request to visit his girlfriend to see his child was denied by the Crown.
In August 1979, van Haarlem played a key role in scuttling a plea bargain from the Crown under which Campbell would plea guilty to second degree murder in exchange for the Port Hope 8 would plea guilty to being accessories after the fact and would serve four years in prison.
Van Haarlem insisted that he should not have to do any prison time as he was not at the Queen's Hotel on the night of the murder, leading him to reject the plea bargain.
The trial for the Port Hope 8 began in London, Ontario on 4 September 1979.
Along with David George Hoffman, van Haarlem was the only one of the Port Hope 8 who testified in his own defense.
At the trial, only one of the Crown's witnesses, Helen Ann Mitchell, identified van Haarlem as present at the Queen's Hotel at the time of the Matiyek murder.
She testified that she saw van Haarlem, Gary Comeau, Richard Sauvé, Larry Hurren and David George Hoffman all present at the Queen's Hotel engaged in a discussion just before the murder.
Another of the Crown's witnesses, Susan Jean Foote, who knew Mitchell, was to testify that she could not remember seeing Mitchell at the Queen's Hotel on the night of the murder.
Mitchell made a poor impression on the jury due to her rambling, often incoherent testimony.
Many of her statements were vague as she failed to name the bartender at the Queen's Hotel on the night of 18 October as she stated she could not remember his name or face.
One of the "Port Hope 8", Jeff McLeod was to claim to a private detective in an interview on 6 February 1992 that it was common knowledge that van Haarlem "was screwing McReelis's wife" and that was the reason why van Haarlem was charged with Matiyek's murder.
Donald Avison, the federal civil servant who reexamined the Port Hope 8 case in 1990 at the request of the federal justice minister, Kim Campbell, stated in an interview on 7 February 1992: "There's some suggestion that van Haarlem had spent some time with McReelis' wife".
For his defense, van Haarlem hired Donald Ebbs as his counsel.