Age, Biography and Wiki
Franklin Bicknell was born on 20 March, 1906 in Great Amwell, is a British physician and writer. Discover Franklin Bicknell's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 58 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
Physician, writer |
Age |
58 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Pisces |
Born |
20 March, 1906 |
Birthday |
20 March |
Birthplace |
Great Amwell |
Date of death |
1964 |
Died Place |
N/A |
Nationality |
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 20 March.
He is a member of famous physician with the age 58 years old group.
Franklin Bicknell Height, Weight & Measurements
At 58 years old, Franklin Bicknell height not available right now. We will update Franklin Bicknell's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Franklin Bicknell Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Franklin Bicknell worth at the age of 58 years old? Franklin Bicknell’s income source is mostly from being a successful physician. He is from . We have estimated Franklin Bicknell's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
physician |
Franklin Bicknell Social Network
Instagram |
|
Linkedin |
|
Twitter |
|
Facebook |
|
Wikipedia |
|
Imdb |
|
Timeline
Franklin Bicknell (20 March 1906 – 1964) M.D, M.R.C.P was a British physician, nutritionist and writer.
Bicknell was born at Great Amwell.
He was the consulting physician for French Hospital, London.
He practiced medicine at Wimpole Street.
Bicknell was Chairman of the Food Education Society and a member of the Royal College of Physicians.
Bicknell co-authored Vitamins In Medicine in 1946 which was positively reviewed by the British Medical Journal as a "very fine work".
The scholarly volume went through several editions and was positively reviewed by physician Paul S. Rhoads who noted that it was a comprehensive text written with skill and thoroughness.
Bicknell argued for people to eat more dietary fats and meat.
In 1947, Bicknell wrote a controversial article "Dying England" in The Medical Press supporting Albert Howard's idea that English people are malnourished.
The article made sensationalist media headlines.
Bicknell stated that "England is dying from starvation" and that the average person was only getting 2,100 calories a day when they needed 3,000.
He believed the British population were suffering from prolonged chronic malnutrition.
Bicknell ended his polemic with "once we were a great, a prosperous, a happy nation: once we were well fed."
Lord Woolton the appointed Minister of Food described Bicknell's claim as a "monstrous falsehood".
He checked with the Ministry of Food and contradicted Bicknell's claim that the average person was getting 2,100 calories a day.
The actual figure he stated, was 2,900.
John Strachey commented that Bicknell had failed to take into account important factors such as the amount of food consumed in canteens and restaurants.
He advocated low-carbohydrate dieting and wrote the introduction for Richard Mackarness' book Eat Fat and Grow Slim in 1958.
Bicknell authored Chemicals in Food and in Farm Produce, in 1960.
The book argued that birth defects both mental and physical are caused by alien substances added to foods.
It was negatively reviewed in the British Journal of Industrial Medicine as scientifically misleading.
A review in The Quarterly Review of Biology suggested that "while all will agree that we are against poisons in our foods, this volume contributes little to understanding how difficult it is at times to determine what is a poison."