Age, Biography and Wiki

Frank Gaziano was born on 8 September, 1963 in Quincy, Massachusetts, U.S., is an American judge (born 1963). Discover Frank Gaziano's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 60 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Age 60 years old
Zodiac Sign Virgo
Born 8 September, 1963
Birthday 8 September
Birthplace Quincy, Massachusetts, U.S.
Nationality United States

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 8 September. He is a member of famous with the age 60 years old group.

Frank Gaziano Height, Weight & Measurements

At 60 years old, Frank Gaziano height not available right now. We will update Frank Gaziano's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Frank Gaziano Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Frank Gaziano worth at the age of 60 years old? Frank Gaziano’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from United States. We have estimated Frank Gaziano's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income

Frank Gaziano Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook Frank Gaziano Facebook
Wikipedia Frank Gaziano Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1963

Frank M. Gaziano (born September 8, 1963) is an associate justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

1986

Born in Quincy, Massachusetts, Gaziano received his Bachelor of Arts from Lafayette College in 1986 and his Juris Doctor from Suffolk University Law School in 1989.

He began his legal career at the Boston law firm of Foley Hoag as a litigation associate.

1991

In 1991, he entered public service as an assistant district attorney with the Plymouth County District Attorney's Office in Brockton.

2001

In 2001, he was appointed the First Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, where he was a member of the Organized Crime Strike Force.

Gaziano was previously an associate justice for the Massachusetts Superior Court.

2004

He was nominated to the court by Governor Mitt Romney in 2004.

He served as the Regional Administrative Justice for Plymouth County and for Criminal Business in Suffolk County.

He also chaired the Supreme Judicial Court's Standing Committee on Criminal Rules and was a member of the Supreme Judicial Court's Model Homicide Jury Instruction Committee.

2016

Gaziano was nominated to the Supreme Judicial Court by Governor Charlie Baker on June 14, 2016, and confirmed by the Governor's Council on July 13, 2016.

He succeeded Justice Francis X. Spina, who retired on August 12, 2016.

2020

In April 2020, Gaziano wrote for the unanimous court when it found that warrantless use of automatic number-plate recognition cameras to surveil a suspected heroin distributor's bridge crossings to Cape Cod was not an unconstitutional search because of the limited time and scope of the observations.

In February 2022, the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that a criminal defendant lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in a Snapchat story he shared with an undercover Boston police officer, who friended the defendant using a pseudonym and then used the clip to charge him in an illegal gun case.

Writing for the court, Gaziano said that requiring police officers to always identify themselves would render "virtually all undercover work" unconstitutional.