Age, Biography and Wiki

Evert Willem Beth was born on 7 July, 1908, is a Dutch philosopher and logician. Discover Evert Willem Beth's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 55 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Age 55 years old
Zodiac Sign Cancer
Born 7 July, 1908
Birthday 7 July
Birthplace N/A
Date of death 12 April, 1964
Died Place N/A
Nationality

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 7 July. He is a member of famous philosopher with the age 55 years old group.

Evert Willem Beth Height, Weight & Measurements

At 55 years old, Evert Willem Beth height not available right now. We will update Evert Willem Beth's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Evert Willem Beth Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Evert Willem Beth worth at the age of 55 years old? Evert Willem Beth’s income source is mostly from being a successful philosopher. He is from . We have estimated Evert Willem Beth's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income philosopher

Evert Willem Beth Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1908

Evert Willem Beth (7 July 1908 – 12 April 1964) was a Dutch philosopher and logician, whose work principally concerned the foundations of mathematics.

He was a member of the Significs Group.

Beth was born in Almelo, a small town in the eastern Netherlands.

His father had studied mathematics and physics at the University of Amsterdam, where he had been awarded a PhD.

Evert Beth studied the same subjects at Utrecht University, but then also studied philosophy and psychology.

1935

His 1935 PhD was in philosophy.

1946

In 1946, he became professor of logic and the foundations of mathematics in Amsterdam.

1951

Apart from two brief interruptions – a stint in 1951 as a research assistant to Alfred Tarski, and in 1957 as a visiting professor at Johns Hopkins University – he held the post in Amsterdam continuously until his death in 1964.

His was the first academic post in his country in logic and the foundations of mathematics, and during this time he contributed actively to international cooperation in establishing logic as an academic discipline.

1953

In 1953 he became member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

He died in Amsterdam.

The Beth definability theorem states that for first-order logic a property (or function or constant) is implicitly definable if and only if it is explicitly definable.

Further explanation is provided under Beth definability.

Beth's most famous contribution to formal logic is semantic tableaux, which are decision procedures for propositional logic and first-order logic.

It is a semantic method—like Wittgenstein's truth tables or J. Alan Robinson's resolution—as opposed to the proof of theorems in a formal system, such as the axiomatic systems employed by Frege, Russell and Whitehead, and Hilbert, or even Gentzen's natural deduction.

Semantic tableaux are an effective decision procedure for propositional logic, whereas they are only semi-effective for first-order logic, since first-order logic is undecidable, as showed by Church's theorem.

This method is considered by many to be intuitively simple, particularly for students who are not acquainted with the study of logic, and it is faster than the truth-table method (which requires a table with 2n rows for a sentence with n propositional letters).

For these reasons, Wilfrid Hodges for example presents semantic tableaux in his introductory textbook, Logic, and Melvin Fitting does the same in his presentation of first-order logic for computer scientists, First-order logic and automated theorem proving.

One starts out with the intention of proving that a certain set \Gamma \, of formulae entail another formula \varphi\,, given a set of rules determined by the semantics of the formulae's connectives (and quantifiers, in first-order logic).

The method is to assume the concurrent truth of every member of \Gamma \, and of (the negation of \varphi\,), and then to apply the rules to branch this list into a tree-like structure of (simpler) formulae until every possible branch contains a contradiction.

At this point it will have been established that is inconsistent, and thus that the formulae of \Gamma\, together entail \varphi \,.

These are a class of relational models for non-classical logic (cf. Kripke semantics).