Age, Biography and Wiki
Dan Polster (Dan Aaron Polster) was born on 6 December, 1951 in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S., is an American judge (born 1951). Discover Dan Polster's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 72 years old?
Popular As |
Dan Aaron Polster |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
72 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Sagittarius |
Born |
6 December, 1951 |
Birthday |
6 December |
Birthplace |
Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 6 December.
He is a member of famous with the age 72 years old group.
Dan Polster Height, Weight & Measurements
At 72 years old, Dan Polster height not available right now. We will update Dan Polster's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Dan Polster Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Dan Polster worth at the age of 72 years old? Dan Polster’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from United States. We have estimated Dan Polster's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
Dan Polster Social Network
Instagram |
|
Linkedin |
|
Twitter |
|
Facebook |
|
Wikipedia |
|
Imdb |
|
Timeline
Dan Aaron Polster (born December 6, 1951) is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Born in Cleveland, Polster received a Bachelor of Arts from Harvard College in 1972 and earned a Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School in 1976.
He was a trial attorney in the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice from 1976 to 1982, and an assistant United States attorney in the Northern District of Ohio from 1982 to 1998.
On July 31, 1997, Polster was nominated by President Bill Clinton to a seat on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio vacated by David Dudley Dowd Jr.. Polster was confirmed by the United States Senate on July 31, 1998, and received his commission on August 3, 1998.
He assumed senior status on January 31, 2021.
Polster mediated a settlement between the city of Cleveland and the family of Tamir Rice, a 12-year-old black boy who was killed by a white police officer in 2014.
Polster mediated a settlement between the city of Cleveland and the family of Tamir Rice, a 12-year-old black boy who was killed by a white police officer in 2014.
Rice's mother said "It's disturbing that I had to put a price on my son, that I was forced to make a decision I didn't want to make."
She said she is angry and frustrated that no one has been held accountable for her son's death.
The settlement meant that there would not be answers to some of the questions raised in the civil lawsuit, including whether dispatchers passed along sufficient information to the police and whether the department erred in hiring the officer who killed Rice.
Some experts have questioned whether the settlement will lead to adequate reforms of the police department.
Polster helped to mediate a lawsuit over limits on protests at the 2016 Republican National Convention.
In December 2017, a federal judicial panel selected Polster to preside over more than 3,000 consolidated prescription opioid-related lawsuits in multidistrict litigation known as the National Prescription Opiate Litigation.
A trial for the litigation began in October 2021.
In February 2017, Polster said that comments made by Donald Trump criticizing federal judges called the president's legitimacy into question.
Polster mediated settlements in 700 cases involving medical contract dye.
Of mediation, Polster has said "Sometimes I feel like I am a therapist, or a rabbi or a priest. I had to train myself to lean in to the emotions. For lawyers, it is just the facts–forget the feelings and emotions."
He has said "I can do things, as a judge, that no one else can, because I am the judge. I also use my courtroom in the mediation. Mediation is qualitatively different if the party is sitting in the very courtroom, the very seat, he or she will be in if the case is tried in front of the jury box. I use that!"
In December 2017, a federal judicial panel selected Polster to preside over more than 3,000 consolidated prescription opioid-related lawsuits in multidistrict litigation known as the National Prescription Opiate Litigation.
The multidistrict litigation is a master case designed to simultaneously resolve all opioid lawsuits against drug companies and pharmacies.
The defendants include makers of prescription painkillers, companies that distribute them, and pharmacies that dispense them.
Legal experts have described the opioid litigation as the largest and most complex civil lawsuit in U.S. history.
During the case's first hearing in January 2018, Polster told lawyers that he planned to dispense with legal norms like discovery and ordered lawyers to immediately prepare for settlement discussions.
The New York Times reported that many lawyers on both sides "were scathing, questioning his grasp of the issues and predicting that a stepped-up timetable was bound to collapse."
Attorneys cited Polster's January 2018 remark that "My objective is to do something meaningful to abate the [opioid] crisis and to do it in 2018."
Polster declined to step aside.
In September 2019, attorneys for eight drug distributors sought to disqualify Polster from the case, saying his public comments about his intention to get plaintiffs help showed evidence of bias.
In April 2019, Polster barred the media from court proceedings in the opioid lawsuit.
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press criticized this move, saying "the public is presumed to have the right of access to proceedings in civil cases."
Polster issued a gag order limiting the ability of attorneys to speak publicly about the litigation.
An investigation by Reuters "showed that Polster has been more willing to seal documents than other judges involved in opioid litigation, raising concerns that important information about the crisis remains secret."
In June 2019, a three-judge panel of the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Polster's blocking of the release of court records in opioid cases was inappropriate.
Polster rejected arguments from Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose to limit the use of ballot drop boxes in the 2020 election.
LaRose immediately appealed the decision.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit granted an injunction against Polster's ruling, leaving the ultimate decision to be made after election day.
The appeals court ruled that "Ohio's restrictions are reasonable and non-discriminatory" and that the state "offers many ways to vote."
The plaintiffs dropped the case on October 22, facing the possibility of $40,000 in court costs.
In April 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a sharp rebuke of Polster, writing that his pretrial ruling allowing plaintiffs to add new claims more than a year after the deadline was a "clear abuse of discretion."
Judge Raymond Kethledge wrote that multidistrict litigation is "not some kind of judicial border country, where the rules are few and the law rarely makes an appearance."
In September 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed Polster's 2019 approval of the nation's first "negotiation class."