Age, Biography and Wiki
Cody Brocious was born on 2 January, 1988 in Waukegan, Illinois, United States, is an American software engineer. Discover Cody Brocious's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is she in this year and how she spends money? Also learn how she earned most of networth at the age of 36 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
Software engineer |
| Age |
36 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Capricorn |
| Born |
2 January, 1988 |
| Birthday |
2 January |
| Birthplace |
Waukegan, Illinois, United States |
| Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 2 January.
She is a member of famous engineer with the age 36 years old group.
Cody Brocious Height, Weight & Measurements
At 36 years old, Cody Brocious height not available right now. We will update Cody Brocious's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about She's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Husband |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Cody Brocious Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Cody Brocious worth at the age of 36 years old? Cody Brocious’s income source is mostly from being a successful engineer. She is from United States. We have estimated Cody Brocious's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
engineer |
Cody Brocious Social Network
Timeline
Despite attempts to expand their stack by also supporting applications on disparate platforms, Falling Leaf Systems officially closed its doors in early 2008.
In 2010, Brocious reverse-engineered the protocol used by the Emotiv EPOC EEG headset, publishing the AES key used for encrypting the sensor data.
The Hardware Hacker Manifesto was published on 21 September 2010.
It gives some insight of the psychology of hardware hackers.
Serafina Brocious goes into an explanation of why it is important for owners to have the right to utilize hardware the way they wish to use it.
Serafina Brocious is an American software engineer best known for her work on PyMusique and her demonstration of Onity HT lock system vulnerabilities in 2012.
Brocious first saw recognition as founder of the PyMusique project, where she worked with Jon Lech Johansen of DeCSS fame.
PyMusique allowed Linux users to purchase music from the iTunes music store without the standard FairPlay DRM implementation in place.
During her employment with MP3Tunes, Brocious also joined forces with Brian Thomason, then an employee of another Michael Robertson company, Linspire Inc., to form Falling Leaf Systems LLC.
Falling Leaf Systems attempted to commercialize the Alky Project, which was started by Brocious to enable Microsoft Windows games to run on other platforms.
Falling Leaf Systems sold access to a membership site dubbed the Sapling Program, whereby users could access a build of Alky allowing them to demo the game Prey on either Linux or Mac OS X.
At the 2012 Black Hat Briefings, Brocious presented several vulnerabilities about the Onity HT lock system, a lock used by the majority of U.S. hotels.
The security hole can be exploited using about US$50 worth of hardware, and it potentially affects millions of hotel rooms.
The device was eventually optimized down to the size of a marker, and was eventually used to perform burglaries.
Onity started rolling out safeguards for the problem in late 2012, which was considered a slow reaction.
However, in 2013 it was still reported that some hotels continued to be vulnerable, likely due to the cost of the security upgrade.
