Age, Biography and Wiki
Terence Hines (Terence Michael Hines) was born on 22 March, 1951 in Hanover, New Hampshire, United States, is an American professor of neurology and science writer. Discover Terence Hines's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 72 years old?
Popular As |
Terence Michael Hines |
Occupation |
Professor of psychology |
Age |
72 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Aries |
Born |
22 March 1951 |
Birthday |
22 March |
Birthplace |
Hanover, New Hampshire, United States |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 22 March.
He is a member of famous Professor with the age 72 years old group.
Terence Hines Height, Weight & Measurements
At 72 years old, Terence Hines height not available right now. We will update Terence Hines's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Terence Hines Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Terence Hines worth at the age of 72 years old? Terence Hines’s income source is mostly from being a successful Professor. He is from United States. We have estimated Terence Hines's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
Professor |
Terence Hines Social Network
Timeline
Terence Michael Hines (born 22 March 1951) is an American academic and researcher.
He is a professor of psychology at Pace University, New York, and adjunct professor of neurology at the New York Medical College; he is also a science writer.
Hines has a BA from Duke University, and an MA and PhD from the University of Oregon.
A fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, Hines is the author of Pseudoscience and the Paranormal which focuses on the fields of pseudoscience and the paranormal in the United States.
He has also, controversially, authored papers expressing doubts about the existence of the G-spot.
Hines is the author of the book Pseudoscience and the Paranormal, which mostly focuses on pseudoscience and the paranormal in the United States.
He distinguishes pseudoscience from science by describing it as a hypothesis inconsistent with the known laws of physics, but one which cannot be falsified.
In his book, Hines argues that pseudoscience tends not to be updated in the face of newly obtained evidence, and he highlights the difficulty in clearly demarcating pseudoscience from the paranormal.
He also postulates that if paranormal abilities such as clairvoyance or precognition were possible, then surely one would expect casino and lottery incomes to be affected, although no such effect is observed.
Hines is a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, an organization that promotes skeptical inquiry of paranormal claims.
In a 2001 comprehensive review article, Hines claimed that the evidence for the existence of the Gräfenberg spot ("G-spot"), a spot that 84% of women believe exists, was too weak, and that claims of its existence were based on small sample sizes and not supported by biochemistry or anatomy (particularly the lack of extra nerve endings in the region).
Most of the studies at that time had also been conducted by a single team.
Hines asserted that if such a spot exists, it is not particular to the Skene's glands.
He described the G-spot as a "sort of gynecologic UFO: much sought for, much discussed, but unverified by objective means".
The initial review resulted in a large controversy with three publications quickly defending its existence.