Age, Biography and Wiki
Sergio Casas was born on 13 January, 1971 in San Blas de los Sauces, Argentina, is an Argentine politician. Discover Sergio Casas's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 53 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
N/A |
| Age |
53 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Capricorn |
| Born |
13 January 1971 |
| Birthday |
13 January |
| Birthplace |
San Blas de los Sauces, Argentina |
| Nationality |
Argentina
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 13 January.
He is a member of famous politician with the age 53 years old group.
Sergio Casas Height, Weight & Measurements
At 53 years old, Sergio Casas height not available right now. We will update Sergio Casas's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Wife |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Sergio Casas Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Sergio Casas worth at the age of 53 years old? Sergio Casas’s income source is mostly from being a successful politician. He is from Argentina. We have estimated Sergio Casas's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
politician |
Sergio Casas Social Network
Timeline
Sergio Casas (born 13 January 1971) is an Argentine politician who was Governor of La Rioja Province from 2015 to 2019.
He previously served as Vice Governor and as a member of the La Rioja provincial legislature.
Casas was a local deputy for the La Rioja Province from 1995 to 2011.
He won the primary elections in the local Justicialist Party to run as governor, defeating the ministers Javier Tineo and Néstor Bosetti; Bosetti would run as his candidate for vicegovernor.
He was elected governor in 2015 with the 53% of the vote.
The candidate of the Radical Civic Union denounced electoral fraud, but eventually accepted Casas' victory.
Casas attended the presidential inauguration of Mauricio Macri on December 10, 2015, in spite of the instructions from the Front for Victory to avoid doing so.
He then returned to La Rioja, to take office as governor.
He had a personal meeting with Macri shortly after they took office, and they talked about the problems of the province.
They agreed in the need to improve the infrastructure of the province.
In contrast with Beder Herrera, Casas received the local mayors and legislators of other political parties, to arrange joint actions on behalf of the province.
He announced that he would promote the production of tomatoes.
Since 2019, he has been a National Deputy.
The province allows for a re-election, but as he served as vice-governor and governor in two consecutive terms, he may not run again in 2019.
He acknowledges both the former governor Beder Herrera and the former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner as political leaders.
He made an amendment to the constitution of La Rioja, to be able to run for a new term in 2019.
It was followed by a referendum: only 43.95% of the registered voters attended it, and of those 25.27% supported the amendment and 17.90% rejected it.
However, the local parties did not agree on the interpretation of the results.
Cambiemos, the main opposition alliance, considered that Casas should have obtained 35% of the vote to approve the amendment, and Casas considered that it was instead the explicit rejection the one that should have achieved such 35%.
As a result, they did not agree if the amendment should be in force or not.
