Age, Biography and Wiki
Nataline Sarkisyan (Nataline Mary Sarkisyan) was born on 10 July, 1990 in Los Angeles, California, U.S., is an American student. Discover Nataline Sarkisyan's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 17 years old?
Popular As |
Nataline Mary Sarkisyan |
Occupation |
Student |
Age |
17 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Cancer |
Born |
10 July 1990 |
Birthday |
10 July |
Birthplace |
Los Angeles, California, U.S. |
Date of death |
20 December, 2007 |
Died Place |
Los Angeles, California, U.S. |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 10 July.
He is a member of famous Student with the age 17 years old group.
Nataline Sarkisyan Height, Weight & Measurements
At 17 years old, Nataline Sarkisyan height not available right now. We will update Nataline Sarkisyan's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Krikor (also spelled Grigor) and Hilda Sarkisyan |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Nataline Sarkisyan Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Nataline Sarkisyan worth at the age of 17 years old? Nataline Sarkisyan’s income source is mostly from being a successful Student. He is from United States. We have estimated Nataline Sarkisyan's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
Student |
Nataline Sarkisyan Social Network
Timeline
Co. v. Dedeaux'', 1987 U.S. Supreme Court ruling shielding employer-paid healthcare plans from damages over their coverage decisions.
Nataline Mary Sarkisyan (July 10, 1990 – December 20, 2007) was an American teenager with recurrent leukemia.
The cost of a liver transplant and one year of follow-up care was $450,000 in 2005.
UCLA declined two livers while waiting for insurance approval from Cigna.
Ms. Sarkisyan's family was also informed that they could proceed with the transplant if they could make a down-payment of $75,000.
Among the groups who publicly spoke out against Cigna's decision was the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee.
Wendell Potter, a Cigna PR executive, advised the board to cover the cost of Sarkisyan's liver transplant as her situation became increasingly high profile.
A flash point occurred during a protest for Sarkisyan in front of Cigna's offices in Glendale, California with live coverage from CNN.
During the protest, the company agreed to reverse its decision and offered to pay for the transplant itself (independent of the insurance policy) when it made the exception to the policy.
Potter advised a colleague from the regional office to inform the Sarkisyan family that Cigna would provide coverage, to which Hilda Sarkisyan, Nataline's mother, responded by jumping in joy and hugging supporters.
Nataline Sarkisyan died a few hours after Cigna's reversal of its policy.
Sarkisyan is buried at Forest Lawn Memorial Park (Hollywood Hills).
Her case became part of the health care reform debate in the United States in 2007 when Cigna HealthCare denied coverage for a liver transplant operation.
The company later reversed its decision after a great deal of media attention to her story, but Sarkisyan died hours later.
Sarkisyan was born to an Armenian-American family.
She was diagnosed with leukemia at age 14.
She was covered under her father's health insurance, through his employer, Mercedes-Benz.
The employer plan was administered by Cigna HealthCare.
During her treatment for leukemia, her liver deteriorated.
Sarkisyan's doctors at the UCLA Medical Center told the family and Cigna that they recommended a liver transplant, and patients in similar circumstances have a six-month survival rate of 65%.
Different doctors gave different estimates of the likelihood of success.
Dr. John Roberts, chief of the transplant service at UC San Francisco (not the transplant center treating Sarkisyan), said that his center generally does not accept a patient without a 50% or greater five-year survival rate.
Dr. Goran Klintmalm, chief of the Baylor Regional Transplant Institute in Dallas, said this particular operation was a "very high-risk transplant," but that he would consider the same operation on a similar patient.
On December 11, 2007, Cigna rejected the request for coverage for the liver transplant.
Sarkisyan's doctors at UCLA, including the head of its transplant unit, wrote a letter to protest that the treatment proposed was neither experimental nor unproven and called on Cigna to urgently review its decision.
Cigna HealthCare refused to pay for treatment by citing policy provisions which do not cover services considered experimental, investigational and/or unproven to be safe and/or effective for the patient.
Cigna said that it had no financial stake in the decision because it only administered the insurance plan and would not bear the cost of any operation.
Sarkisyan's family spoke out at a New Hampshire rally in support of Senator John Edwards' presidential campaign on January 6, 2008, based on his advocacy of reforming and overhauling the US health care system.
Cigna PR Executive Wendell Potter resigned shortly after Sarkisyan's death and blew the whistle on the health insurance industry.
Sarkisyan's family retained attorney Mark Geragos to sue Cigna, and requested that Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley file murder charges against the insurer.
The case was thrown out due to a ''Pilot Life Ins.