Age, Biography and Wiki

Manu Sharma (Siddharth Vashisht) was born on 1977 in Jalandhar, India, is a Convicted murderer (born 1977). Discover Manu Sharma's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 47 years old?

Popular As Siddharth Vashisht
Occupation Pub owner
Age 47 years old
Zodiac Sign N/A
Born
Birthday
Birthplace Jalandhar, India
Nationality India

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on . He is a member of famous murderer with the age 47 years old group.

Manu Sharma Height, Weight & Measurements

At 47 years old, Manu Sharma height not available right now. We will update Manu Sharma's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Who Is Manu Sharma's Wife?

His wife is Preity Sharma (m. 2015)

Family
Parents Venod Sharma (father)
Wife Preity Sharma (m. 2015)
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Manu Sharma Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Manu Sharma worth at the age of 47 years old? Manu Sharma’s income source is mostly from being a successful murderer. He is from India. We have estimated Manu Sharma's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income murderer

Manu Sharma Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia Manu Sharma Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1977

Siddharth Vashisht (born 1977), better known as Manu Sharma, is a murderer of Indian origin, convicted in 2006 to serve life imprisonment for the 1999 Murder of Jessica Lal.

Sharma was born in 1977.

1990

His father was a member of parliament in the Rajya Sabha during 1990s, elected on an Indian National Congress ticket.

He was later elected to the Haryana legislature.

His uncle is the son-in-law of former President of India, Shankar Dayal Sharma.

The family owns two sugar mills, at Indri in Haryana, and Patran in Punjab.

Sharma suffers from asthma and for this reason, he was favoured during his childhood.

He completed two years of undergraduate courses in Commerce at a college in Chandigarh.

In the late 1990s, Sharma was known to be a regular party-goer in Delhi.

1999

On 29 April 1999, he was present at a party where an unlicensed bar was operating.

Jessica Lal refused to serve him, despite being offered 1000 rupees, and Sharma then fired a .22 pistol and killed her.

Sharma was arrested and charged with murder, destruction of evidence and other offences.

During the trial, 32 witnesses turned "hostile".

2006

Seven years after the case was opened, on 21 February 2006, Sharma and eight others of the twelve accused were acquitted.

The trial judge commented after the outcome that: "The court has acquitted them because the Delhi police failed to sustain the grounds on which they had built up their case. The police failed to recover the weapon which was used to fire at Jessica Lal as well as prove their theory that the two cartridges, emptied shells of which were recovered from the spot, were fired from one weapon."

After his acquittal by the trial court, Sharma was ostracized with SMS campaigns being sent out to boycott all establishments owned by the Sharma family.

The acquittal led to widespread public outcry.

In March 2006, the case was re-admitted in the Delhi High Court where it was tried on a fast-track basis.

Among the evidence re-introduced were two spent cartridges recovered from Sharma's car; the ballistic analysis for one of which showed it as matching the bullet recovered from Lal's skull.

This evidence had been overlooked by the trial court.

On 18 December 2006, the High Court ruled Sharma guilty of murdering Jessica Lal and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

After conviction, he was imprisoned in the Tihar Jail.

Sharma appealed to the Supreme Court of India through his counsel Ram Jethmalani.

2009

On 24 September 2009, the Delhi Lieutenant Governor granted Sharma 30-day parole from jail on the grounds that he needed to attend to his ailing mother, attend the last rites of his grandmother, and also look after the family business which was suffering in his absence.

It was later revealed that the parole was granted despite an objection from the Delhi police.

In November 2009, Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit came under criticism for granting parole to Sharma after media reports of him visiting night clubs in Delhi emerged.

During the parole, he got involved in a brawl with the son of police commissioner of Delhi.

After a public uproar that he violated parole norms, the Delhi Government had to cancel his parole and on 10 November 2009, Sharma returned to Tihar Jail.

Sharma established the Siddhartha Vashishta Charitable Trust during imprisonment.

It is managed by his mother and brother.

According to The Times of India, the Trust is intended to assist causes such as" child education, cancer awareness, [and] rehabilitation of prisoners etc."

2010

However, the court upheld his sentence of life imprisonment on 19 April 2010.

Sharma was incarcerated in the Tihar Jail along with co-accused Vikas Yadav and Amardeep Singh Gill, who had been sentenced for destroying evidence.

Along with another high-profile convict, Santosh Kumar Singh, Sharma was involved in helping other prisoners draft legal appeals.

2015

On 22 April 2015, Sharma married his friend Preity Sharma a Mumbai based model.

The marriage was delayed due to conviction.

2020

He was released in June 2020.

Sharma is the son of the former Indian National Congress leader, Venod Sharma, and the brother of media baron, Kartikeya Sharma.

Manu Sharma is one of several high-profile criminals brought to trial in India through media activism.

Along with that of some other murderers, his conviction is viewed as demonstrating the impact of the general public in correcting imbalances in the Indian legal process.