Age, Biography and Wiki

Julie Rikelman (Yulia G. Rikelman) was born on 16 June, 1972 in Kyiv, Ukraine, is a Ukrainian-American judge (born 1972). Discover Julie Rikelman's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 51 years old?

Popular As Yulia G. Rikelman
Occupation N/A
Age 51 years old
Zodiac Sign Gemini
Born 16 June 1972
Birthday 16 June
Birthplace Kyiv, Ukraine
Nationality Ukraine

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 16 June. He is a member of famous lawyer with the age 51 years old group.

Julie Rikelman Height, Weight & Measurements

At 51 years old, Julie Rikelman height not available right now. We will update Julie Rikelman's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Julie Rikelman Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Julie Rikelman worth at the age of 51 years old? Julie Rikelman’s income source is mostly from being a successful lawyer. He is from Ukraine. We have estimated Julie Rikelman's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income lawyer

Julie Rikelman Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1972

Julie Rikelman (born June 16, 1972) is a Ukrainian-born American lawyer who is serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

She represented the Mississippi abortion clinic in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the U.S. Supreme Court case that overturned the constitutional right to abortion.

1979

She was born in Kyiv, Ukraine, to Jewish parents, immigrating to the U.S. with her family in 1979.

1993

Rikelman received a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, from Harvard College in 1993, and a Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1997.

1997

From 1997 to 1998, Rikelman served as a law clerk for Justice Dana Fabe of the Alaska Supreme Court and from 1998 to 1999, was a law clerk for Judge Morton Ira Greenberg of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

1999

From 1999 to 2001, she was a Blackmun Fellow at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

2001

From 2001 to 2004, she was an associate at Feldman & Orlansky in Anchorage, Alaska.

2004

From 2004 to 2006, she was a senior associate at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett in New York City.

2006

From 2006 to 2011, Rikelman held various positions at NBC Universal, Inc., including vice president of litigation.

2011

From 2011 to 2023, she was the senior litigation director for the Center for Reproductive Rights.

(Tex.2011).

In July 2011, the North Carolina General Assembly passed the Woman's Right to Know Act over a gubernatorial veto.

The act amended Chapter 90 of the North Carolina General Statutes, which governs medical and related professions, adding a new article regulating the steps that must precede an abortion.

Physicians and abortion providers filed suit after the act's passage but before its effective date, asking the court to enjoin enforcement of the act and declare it unconstitutional.

2012

In 2012, Rikelman represented Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services when they sued the commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services and the executive director of the Texas Medical Board.

The plaintiffs alleged constitutional violations resulting from the newly enacted Texas House Bill 15 ("the Act"), an Act "relating to informed consent to an abortion."

2014

In December 2014, Rikelman argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for plaintiffs, who included an abortion provider and her patients seeking abortions.

At issue was a North Carolina statute that required physicians to perform an ultrasound, display the songram, and describe the fetus to women seeking abortions.

2015

H.B. 15, 82nd Leg.

Reg.

Sess.

2020

Rikelman is well known for her representation and advocacy for abortion providers in federal court challenges such as in June Medical Services LLC v. Russo (2020) and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022).

In October 2020, Rikelman was co-counsel representing Whole Woman's Health, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C. and Southwestern Women's Surgery Center on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, and patients.

The case challenged the constitutionality of Texas Senate Bill 8, a statute that requires a woman to undergo an additional and medically unnecessary procedure to cause fetal demise before she may obtain a dilation and evacuation abortion.

This case was argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

In 2021, Rikelman argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for several abortion providers and their patients seeking abortions.

The North Carolina abortion providers brought this action to challenge as unconstitutional the state's criminalization of pre-viability abortions.

On July 29, 2022, President Joe Biden announced his intent to nominate Rikelman to serve as a United States circuit judge for the First Circuit.

On August 1, 2022, her nomination was sent to the Senate.

President Biden nominated Rikelman to the seat vacated by Judge Sandra Lynch, who announced her intent to assume senior status upon confirmation of a successor.

Rikelman was unanimously rated "well qualified" for the judgeship by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary.

On September 21, 2022, a hearing on her nomination was held before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

During her confirmation hearing, she was questioned by several Republican senators over her advocacy for abortion rights.

Rikelman was also questioned about a law review article she authored discussing appellate decisions permitting mandatory blood collection for DNA testing under the Fourth Amendment, arguing that such mandatory collection was prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.

On December 1, 2022, the committee failed to report her nomination by an 11–11 vote.

On January 3, 2023, her nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate; she was renominated later the same day.

On February 9, 2023, her nomination was reported out of committee by an 11–10 vote.

On June 12, 2023, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer filed cloture on her nomination.

On June 15, 2023, the Senate invoked cloture on Rikelman's nomination by a 53–45 vote.

On June 20, 2023, her nomination was confirmed by a 51–43 vote.