Age, Biography and Wiki
John Hadley was born on 27 September, 1966 in Sydney, Australia, is an Australian philosopher. Discover John Hadley's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 57 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
57 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Libra |
Born |
27 September 1966 |
Birthday |
27 September |
Birthplace |
Sydney, Australia |
Nationality |
Australia
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 27 September.
He is a member of famous philosopher with the age 57 years old group.
John Hadley Height, Weight & Measurements
At 57 years old, John Hadley height not available right now. We will update John Hadley's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
John Hadley Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is John Hadley worth at the age of 57 years old? John Hadley’s income source is mostly from being a successful philosopher. He is from Australia. We have estimated John Hadley's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
philosopher |
John Hadley Social Network
Timeline
John Hadley (born 27 September 1966) is an Australian philosopher whose research concerns moral and political philosophy, including animal ethics, environmental ethics, and metaethics.
He is currently a senior lecturer in philosophy in the School of Humanities and Communication Arts at Western Sydney University.
He has previously taught at Charles Sturt University and the University of Sydney, where he studied as an undergraduate and doctoral candidate.
His doctoral thesis was supervised by Caroline West, in USYD's Department of Philosophy, and was submitted in 2006 under the title of Animal Property: Reconciling Ecological Communitarianism and Species-egalitarian Liberalism.
During his doctoral research, the "basic elements" of his animal property rights theory were "first assembled", leading to the publication of "Nonhuman Animal Property: Reconciling Environmentalism and Animal Rights" in the Journal of Social Philosophy.
During this time, he also published in the Journal of Value Inquiry, Philosophy in the Contemporary World, and the Journal of Applied Philosophy, as well as working as a lecturer in the USYD philosophy department and a guest lecturer for the USYD Laboratory Animal Services.
After his PhD, Hadley worked as a lecturer in communication ethics in the Charles Sturt University (CSU) School of Communication and a lecturer in philosophy at the CSU School of Humanities and Social Sciences.
He then joined the University of Western Sydney School of Humanities and Communication Arts, first as a lecturer in philosophy, and then as a senior lecturer in philosophy.
In addition to a variety of articles in peer-reviewed journals and edited collections, he is the author of the 2015 monograph Animal Property Rights (Lexington Books) and the 2019 monograph Animal Neopragmatism (Palgrave Macmillan).
He is also the co-editor, with Elisa Aaltola, of the 2015 collection Animal Ethics and Philosophy (Rowman & Littlefield International).
Hadley is known for his account of animal property rights theory.
He proposes that wild animals be offered property rights over their territories, and that guardians be appointed to represent their interests in decision-making procedures.
He suggests that this account could be justified directly, on the basis of the interests of the animals concerned, or indirectly, so that natural environments are protected.
The theory has received discussion in popular and academic contexts, with critical responses from farming groups and mixed responses from moral and political theorists.
Other work has included a defence of a neopragmatist approach to animal ethics, along with criticism of the metaethical and metaphilosophical assumptions of mainstream animal ethicists.
Hadley has also conducted research on normative issues related to animal rights extremism, the aiding of others, and utilitarianism.
Hadley read for a Bachelor of Arts and doctorate in philosophy at the University of Sydney (USYD).
Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy, a collection edited by Hadley with the Finnish philosopher Elisa Aaltola, was published in 2015 by Rowman & Littlefield International.
The book aimed to move debate in animal ethics beyond developing extensionist accounts and to examine the metaphilosophical and metaethical problems with extensionist accounts.
Hadley's own contribution drew attention to a perceived inconsistent triad in animal rights philosophy: the idea that moral status is determined by psychological factors (like sentience), and not species; that human and nonhuman animals are of the same kind; and that genomic plasticity offers the best explanation for change in natural selection.
In the same year, Hadley published a monograph with Lexington Books entitled Animal Property Rights: A Theory of Territory Rights for Wild Animals.
The book, partially building upon his doctoral research, presents a large amount of new material on Hadley's animal property rights theory.
Hadley has developed his theory of animal property rights through his doctoral research, his 2015 monograph, and other academic works.
In addition, he has authored popular articles on the subject for The Guardian, The Conversation and The Ethics Centre.
He also discussed the topic on Knowing Animals, a podcast series produced by Siobhan O'Sullivan.
His proposal has received attention in the popular press, with strong criticism from farmers' groups and journalists writing on rural affairs.
The practical side of Hadley's proposal rests on two key principles: a guardianship system, according to which knowledgeable guardians would be appointed to represent animal property holders in land management decision-making, and the use of animals' territory-marking behaviour to determine the limits of their property.
Hadley rejects first occupancy and labour-mixing accounts of appropriation, and instead suggests that there are two ways that his account might fruitfully be justified.
First, it might be justified directly, with reference to the interests of animals.
This relies upon the fact that wild animals require their territory in order to satisfy their basic needs and the claim that this results in an interest in territory strong enough to ground a right.
If animals have a right to use their territory, Hadley claims, then they necessarily have a property right in that territory.
Second, it might be justified indirectly, as animals (of some species, at least) might be given property rights as a means of protecting natural environments.
Hadley presents his proposal against the backdrop of an explicit pragmatism, and holds that animal property rights theory has the potential to reconcile animal and environmental ethics.
Hadley's proposal has been placed in the context of the "political turn" in animal ethics; the emergence of animal ethics literature focused on justice.
Another academic who has proposed that wild animals be afforded property rights over their habitats is the British philosopher Steve Cooke.
Like Hadley, he utilises an interest-based account of animal rights, but, unlike Hadley, he suggests that sovereignty would be an appropriate tool to protect animals' interest in their habitat if property fails.
Other theorists exploring the normative aspects of human relationships with wild animals explicitly deny that they are extending property rights to animals.
A second monograph, Animal Neopragmatism, was published in 2019 by Palgrave Macmillan.
This presented a neopragmatist approach to animal ethics.
Hadley is known for his theory of animal property rights, according to which animals should be afforded property rights over their territory.