Age, Biography and Wiki
Helen Toner was born on 1992 in Melbourne, Australia, is an Australian researcher. Discover Helen Toner's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is she in this year and how she spends money? Also learn how she earned most of networth at the age of 32 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
Researcher |
| Age |
32 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
N/A |
| Born |
|
| Birthday |
|
| Birthplace |
Melbourne, Australia |
| Nationality |
Melbourne
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on .
She is a member of famous Researcher with the age 32 years old group.
Helen Toner Height, Weight & Measurements
At 32 years old, Helen Toner height not available right now. We will update Helen Toner's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about She's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Husband |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Helen Toner Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Helen Toner worth at the age of 32 years old? Helen Toner’s income source is mostly from being a successful Researcher. She is from Melbourne. We have estimated Helen Toner's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
Researcher |
Helen Toner Social Network
| Instagram |
|
| Linkedin |
|
| Twitter |
|
| Facebook |
|
| Wikipedia |
|
| Imdb |
|
Timeline
Helen Toner is an Australian researcher and former board member of OpenAI.
Toner was born in 1992 in Melbourne, Australia.
She graduated from the University of Melbourne in 2014 and participated in UN Youth, an organization that provides student engagement in international diplomacy simulations.
During her time at the university, she was recognized by her peers for her academic and extracurricular activities.
Toner's career includes involvement with the effective altruism movement, which focuses on using resources efficiently for charitable impact and ethical development in artificial intelligence.
After graduating, she worked with GiveWell and Open Philanthropy, an initiative co-founded by Dustin Moskovitz.
Toner also worked in China studying the AI industry.
She later worked as a research affiliate at the University of Oxford's centre for the governance of AI, before becoming Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology's director of strategy and foundational research grants.
She has co-written articles in Foreign Affairs.
In late 2021 Toner was appointed to the board of OpenAI.
OpenAI is owned by investors including Microsoft, but the organization has retained its non-for-profit governance structure, making board members accountable to the organization's altruistic goals, rather than shareholders.
In October 2023 she published the report "Decoding Intentions: Artificial Intelligence and Costly Signals" with two co-authors, writing
"OpenAI has also drawn criticism for many other safety and ethics issues related to the launches of ChatGPT and GPT-4, including regarding copyright issues, labor conditions for data annotators, and the susceptibility of their products to “jailbreaks” that allow users to bypass safety controls."
After the paper’s publication, Altman tried to push out Toner because he thought the paper was critical of the company.
On November 17, 2023 Toner along with three other board members voted to remove Sam Altman as CEO of OpenAI.
The board's stated reason was that Altman was "not consistently candid in his communications” with the board, and was influenced by perceptions that Altman was manipulating board members for his own gain. Four days later, the decision was revoked and she was removed from the board of directors.
