Age, Biography and Wiki
Glenn Knight was born on 1945 in Singapore, is a Singaporean lawyer (born 1945). Discover Glenn Knight's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 79 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
Prosecutor (former) Lawyer (current) |
Age |
79 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
|
Born |
1945 |
Birthday |
1945 |
Birthplace |
N/A |
Nationality |
Singapore
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 1945.
He is a member of famous lawyer with the age 79 years old group.
Glenn Knight Height, Weight & Measurements
At 79 years old, Glenn Knight height not available right now. We will update Glenn Knight's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Who Is Glenn Knight's Wife?
His wife is Pathmavali Rengayah
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Pathmavali Rengayah |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Glenn Knight Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Glenn Knight worth at the age of 79 years old? Glenn Knight’s income source is mostly from being a successful lawyer. He is from Singapore. We have estimated Glenn Knight's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
lawyer |
Glenn Knight Social Network
Instagram |
|
Linkedin |
|
Twitter |
|
Facebook |
|
Wikipedia |
|
Imdb |
|
Timeline
Glenn Jeyasingam Knight (born 1945) is a Singaporean lawyer.
He obtained his bachelor of laws degree from the National University of Singapore in the 1960s, and played the guitar in a jazz band to raise money for his tuition fees.
He joined the Singapore Legal Service in 1970 and rose through the ranks "with the speed and power of an Exocet missile," as Queen's Counsel Roy Allaway later described it.
Soon he acquired a reputation for being a law enforcer who prosecuted criminals without fear or favour.
News of his ability and integrity impressed the late David Marshall, so much that when he retired he offered to give Knight a full partnership in his law firm; however, Knight was content to remain in the Legal Service and declined the offer.
Knight is married to Pathmavali Rengayah.
The couple have no children.
In 1978, Knight was the deputy public prosecutor in the trial of former magistrate Khoo Hin Hiong.
In 1983, he acted for the Prosecution again in the trial of Adrian Lim, who had murdered two children.
He was the first Director of the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) when it was founded in 1984.
In 1985, he was the senior state counsel and deputy public prosecutor who filed an affidavit on behalf of the Attorney-General requesting that the High Court cite five defendants for contempt of court over an editorial published in the Asian Wall Street Journal (AWSJ) on 17 October 1985.
Titled "Jeyaretnam's Challenge", the editorial had questioned the "integrity and impartiality" of Singapore's judicial system.
The affidavit led to an apology from the editor of the AWSJ.
In 1986, he was the public prosecutor for the Commercial Affairs Investigation Department who filed charges against key people in Pan Electric Industries ("Pan-El"), such as Tan Kok Liang, Tan Koon Swan, and Peter Tham, in the aftermath of the company's collapse.
For his role in the Pan-El investigations, Knight was commended by then-Finance Minister Richard Hu in 1989.
Knight also led the prosecution team in Singapore's first case of insider trading, that of former United Overseas Bank banker Allan Ng.
In the 1990s, he was the vice-chairman of its Old Boys' Association and a member of its board of governors.
On National Day 1990 (9 August 1990), he was awarded the Public Administration Medal, Gold, for his work as Director of the Commercial Affairs Department.
He lost his post in 1991 after being convicted of corruption in a much-publicised trial.
On 23 March 1991, Knight was suddenly replaced as CAD director by Senior State Counsel Lawrence Ang in a decision that shocked the local legal community.
It turned out that Knight was under investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).
After an investigation lasting more than two months—one of the longest probes into the conduct of a public servant in Singapore—Knight was arrested on 27 May 1991 and charged with corruption the next day.
He was the first Singapore legal officer to face such charges.
Specifically, he was accused of cheating three businessmen into investing S$3,000,000 each into the former Batam Island Country Club on the Indonesian island of Batam, as well as giving false information to the CPIB regarding vehicle purchases, an application for a car loan, and his corporate investments.
In a district court on 29 September 1991, Knight pleaded guilty to cheating then managing director of Trans-Island Bus Services Ng Ser Miang to try to make him invest in the Batam resort project, which had been planned by Knight and his wife.
In October, he was sentenced to three months in prison.
The judge originally set Knight's trial to commence in October 1992, but changed his mind and brought it forward to September 1991 after the prosecution complained that its witnesses had been subject to intimidation, and investigating officers had received mysterious phone calls warning them to "watch out".
In July that year, his wife and two others were also arrested and charged over the Batam resort investments.
Knight appealed against the sentence, and in March 1992 he managed to get his sentence reduced to a $17,000 fine and a day in prison.
He served the jail sentence and paid the fine on the day it was announced.
In deciding to reduce the sentence, High Court Judge L.P. Thean said that a "nominal custodial sentence" was sufficient given the mitigating circumstances in Knight's case.
In April, all charges against his wife in relation to his case were also dropped.
Although the sentence meted to him was eventually reduced, the corruption case had left permanent damage on Knight's career as a civil servant.
After investigations on him began in March 1991, he faced disciplinary hearings and his services were terminated on 26 March 1992.
The President also revoked the prestigious Public Administration Medal, Gold, that had been awarded to Knight.
In August 1994, the High Court struck Knight off the roll of advocates and solicitors, meaning that he could no longer practise law.
After being disbarred, Knight worked as a consultant in a public-listed company.
In 1998, he was again tried and convicted for misappropriating money while in office.
Knight was a student of Anglo-Chinese School.
In 1998, Knight was again charged in court—this time with criminal breach of trust by misappropriating money totalling $4,200 when still the CAD's Director on two occasions, in 1989 and 1990.