Age, Biography and Wiki
David Smilde was born on 23 September, 1966, is an American sociologist. Discover David Smilde's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 57 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
57 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Virgo |
Born |
23 September 1966 |
Birthday |
23 September |
Birthplace |
N/A |
Nationality |
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 23 September.
He is a member of famous with the age 57 years old group.
David Smilde Height, Weight & Measurements
At 57 years old, David Smilde height not available right now. We will update David Smilde's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
David Smilde Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is David Smilde worth at the age of 57 years old? David Smilde’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from . We have estimated David Smilde's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
David Smilde Social Network
Instagram |
|
Linkedin |
|
Twitter |
|
Facebook |
|
Wikipedia |
|
Imdb |
|
Timeline
David Smilde (born September 23, 1966) is an American sociologist and the Charles A and Leo M Favrot Professor at Tulane University, and Senior Fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America.
He is known for his contributions to the sociology of religion and scholarship and advocacy around Venezuela's political crisis.
Smilde graduated from Calvin College with a BA in philosophy and sociology in 1989 and received his MA in 1994 and PhD in 2000 from the University of Chicago.
He completed his dissertation under Wendy Griswold.
In 1995, he received a Fulbright-Hays dissertation fellowship and in 2006 was named a Fulbright Scholar to teach at the Universidad Central de Venezuela.
He has been a residential fellow at the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame, in 2001 and 2020.
Smilde became an important voice advocating for democracy in Venezuela, frequently commenting in the media and writing numerous opinion articles in The New York Times, Washington Post, and El País.
His 2007 book Reason to Believe: Cultural Agency in Latin American Evangelicalism won the 2008 Best Book Award in the Sociology of Religion section of the American Sociological Association.
He has also won best article awards from the Sociology of Religion Section and the Association for the Sociology of Religion.
From 2010 to 2012, he was chair of the Venezuelan Studies Section of the Latin American Studies Association.
He is the program co-chair of the 2023 Latin American Studies Association Congress in Vancouver.
From 2011 to 2018, he was editor-in-chief of the journal Qualitative Sociology.
In 2012, he founded the blog Venezuelan Politics and Human Rights and curated it for the Washington Office on Latin America until 2020.
From 2015 to 2018, he was a part of the International Panel on Social Progress and co-authored the report's chapter on religion.
In March 2017, he testified in a U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Venezuela, advocating against sanctions.
His Venezuela advocacy has been criticized from the right and the left.
In the Venezuelan blog Caracas Chronicles, Juan Cristobal Nagel criticized Smilde's analysis saying it “passing off government propaganda as cold analysis under the veneer of impartiality." In Jacobin, Daniel Finn argued that Smilde criticizes the possibility of military intervention but is simply advocating "for intervention of a different kind."