Age, Biography and Wiki
Consuelo Bland Marshall (Consuelo Bland Arnold) was born on 28 September, 1936 in Knoxville, Tennessee, is an American judge (born 1936). Discover Consuelo Bland Marshall's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is she in this year and how she spends money? Also learn how she earned most of networth at the age of 87 years old?
Popular As |
Consuelo Bland Arnold |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
87 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Libra |
Born |
28 September 1936 |
Birthday |
28 September |
Birthplace |
Knoxville, Tennessee |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 28 September.
She is a member of famous with the age 87 years old group.
Consuelo Bland Marshall Height, Weight & Measurements
At 87 years old, Consuelo Bland Marshall height not available right now. We will update Consuelo Bland Marshall's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Who Is Consuelo Bland Marshall's Husband?
Her husband is George E. Marshall
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Husband |
George E. Marshall |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Consuelo Bland Marshall Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Consuelo Bland Marshall worth at the age of 87 years old? Consuelo Bland Marshall’s income source is mostly from being a successful . She is from United States. We have estimated Consuelo Bland Marshall's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
Consuelo Bland Marshall Social Network
Instagram |
|
Linkedin |
|
Twitter |
|
Facebook |
|
Wikipedia |
|
Imdb |
|
Timeline
Consuelo Bland Marshall (born September 28, 1936) is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Born in Knoxville, Tennessee, Marshall received an Associate of Arts degree from Los Angeles City College in 1956.
She received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Howard University in 1958.
She received a Bachelor of Laws from Howard University School of Law in 1961.
She was a deputy city attorney of Los Angeles City Attorney's Office from 1962 to 1967.
She was in private practice of law in Los Angeles, California from 1968 to 1970.
She was a Commissioner of the Juvenile Court of the Los Angeles County Superior Court from 1971 to 1976.
She was a judge of the Civil and Criminal Division of the Inglewood Municipal Court in Inglewood, California from 1976 to 1977.
She was a judge of the Criminal Division of the Los Angeles County Superior Court from 1977 to 1980.
Marshall was nominated by President Jimmy Carter on June 20, 1980, to a seat on the United States District Court for the Central District of California vacated by Judge Robert Firth.
She was confirmed by the United States Senate on September 29, 1980, and received her commission on September 30, 1980.
Between 1983 and 1992, legal hardship and economic disenfranchisement were the product of continual delays; further, no public hearing was ever granted to plaintiff(s) in their effort to assert their first amendment rights under the U.S. constitution.
She served as Chief Judge from 2001 to 2005.
She assumed senior status on October 24, 2005.
A notable decision was rendered by Judge Marshall in the matter Preferred Communications Inc. v. City of Los Angeles.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and later the U.S. Supreme Court found that the City of Los Angeles violated the First Amendment through its procedure relative to the South Central Los Angeles Cable Television Franchise specifically by depriving Preferred Communications Inc. access to the public utility lines.
Marshal would dismiss the case twice; and, twice, Marshall was reversed, in two higher courts.
In sum, twelve senior members of the bench superseded Marshall's dismissal of the case; three judges from the 9th Circuit and nine Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court.
The 9th Circuit summarizes: "'...[w]e affirm the district court's decision insofar as it pertains to the plaintiff's antitrust claims and reverse its dismissal of the First Amendment claim,'"and, subsequently, the Supreme Court of the United States of America "dismissed as improper" Marshall's ruling, stating:"'...[t]he complaint should not have been dismissed. The activities in which respondent allegedly seeks to engage plainly implicate First Amendment interests.'"Multiple delays permeate the timeline of events before and after the separate rulings from the higher courts.
While it was the opinion of Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist that: "the City of Los Angeles was obligated to allow [Preferred Communications Inc.] use of its physical capacity to further speech," the Plaintiff(s) were deprived a jury trial to determine damages for roughly a decade.