Age, Biography and Wiki
Asif Iqbal was born on 24 April, 1981 in West Bromwich, West Midlands, England, is a British citizen (born 1981). Discover Asif Iqbal's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 42 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
42 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Taurus |
Born |
24 April 1981 |
Birthday |
24 April |
Birthplace |
West Bromwich, West Midlands, England |
Nationality |
United Kingdom
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 24 April.
He is a member of famous with the age 42 years old group.
Asif Iqbal Height, Weight & Measurements
At 42 years old, Asif Iqbal height not available right now. We will update Asif Iqbal's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Asif Iqbal Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Asif Iqbal worth at the age of 42 years old? Asif Iqbal’s income source is mostly from being a successful . He is from United Kingdom. We have estimated Asif Iqbal's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
Asif Iqbal Social Network
Timeline
Asif Iqbal (born 24 April 1981) is a British citizen who was held in extrajudicial detention as a terror suspect in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps in Cuba from early 2002 to 9 March 2004.
He is one of the Tipton Three, three friends from the same town who were captured together in Afghanistan.
Iqbal was born on 24 April 1981 in West Bromwich and later lived in Tipton, both of which are in the West Midlands of England.
The three were captured in Afghanistan by the Northern Alliance and transferred to United States military custody.
After the completion of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in January 2002, they were transferred there, where they were interrogated and held without recourse to lawyers.
Iqbal's Guantanamo detainee Internment Serial Number was 87.
He and his friends were returned to Britain, where the government released them without charges the day after their arrival.
The three-page Joint Task Force Guantanamo assessment was drafted on 28 October 2003.
It was signed by camp commandant Major General Geoffrey D. Miller.
In August 2004, Iqbal, Ahmed and Rasul released a lengthy report on the physical and mental abuses suffered while in US custody, which included sexual and religious humiliation.
According to the BBC, the three describe significant abuse, including being repeatedly punched, kicked, slapped, forcibly injected with drugs, deprived of sleep, hooded, photographed naked, and subjected to body cavity searches, and sexual and religious humiliations.
An American guard allegedly told the inmates: "The world does not know you're here - we would kill you and no-one would know."
Iqbal said when he arrived at Guantanamo, one of the soldiers told him: "You killed my family in the towers and now it's time to get you back."
Rasul said a British MI5 officer had told him during an interrogation that he would be detained in Guantanamo for life.
The men said they saw the beating of mentally ill inmates and that another man was left brain damaged after a beating by soldiers as punishment for attempting suicide.
The Britons said an inmate told them he was shown a video of hooded men - apparently inmates - being forced to sodomise one another.
Guards threw Qur'ans belonging to prisoners into toilets and tried to force them to give up their religion.
In the report they allege that those who identified as being from MI5, or the British Foreign Office, seemed unconcerned with their welfare.
They said that the appointment of General Geoffrey Miller coincided with the alleged introduction of new, harsher, treatment, including short shackling and the forced shaving off of beards, which the men kept for religious purposes.
In the end, the abusive interrogation led the three to falsely confess to being the three previously unidentified faces in a video that showed a meeting between Osama bin Laden and Mohamed Atta, although Rasul was in the UK during the time period when the video was created.
While still in detention, the Tipton Three had filed habeas corpus petitions, which were consolidated under Rasul v. Bush (2004).
All the detainees had been prevented from seeing or contacting legal counsel and challenging their detention before a tribunal, under habeas corpus. Two other major cases of habeas corpus petitions were consolidated under Rasul v. Bush, including Habib v. Bush and Al-Odah v. United States.
In a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, made in June 2004 after their release, it determined that detainees were covered by the jurisdiction of US courts and had constitutional rights, including the right to counsel and to habeas corpus.
Following that, the United States Department of Defense (DOD) devised the Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) to evaluate whether detainees qualified as enemy combatants, and military commissions to try charges against them.
CSRTs were held beginning in 2004.
After their release, in 2004, Rasul v. Rumsfeld, the plaintiffs and former detainees Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal, Ruhal Ahmed, and Jamal Al-Harith, sued former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
They charge that Secretary Rumsfeld and the military chain of command permitted illegal interrogation tactics to be used against them.
The plaintiffs each sought compensatory damages for torture and arbitrary detention while being held at Guantánamo.
Some aspects of the case were dismissed at the District Court level.
The Appeals Court overturned the lower court ruling on coverage of religious protections.
Their story was portrayed in the docu-drama, Road to Guantanamo (2006).
The film, The Road to Guantánamo (2006) is a docu-drama by the director Michael Winterbottom based on their accounts of their capture, interrogations and detention.
It uses both actors and interviews with the former detainees.
In 2008, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals, based on the intervening Boumediene v. Bush (2008).
In that case, it had ruled that detainees and foreign nationals had the habeas corpus right to bring suit in federal courts.
On 24 April 2009, the Court of Appeals dismissed the Rasul v. Rumsfeld case again, on the grounds of "limited immunity" of government officials.
It ruled that the courts at the time of the alleged abuses had not yet clearly established legal prohibitions against the torture and religious abuses suffered by the detainees.
On 14 December 2009, the US Supreme Court declined to accept the case for hearing.
On 25 April 2011, whistleblower organization WikiLeaks published formerly secret assessments drafted by Joint Task Force Guantanamo analysts.