Age, Biography and Wiki
Aramis Ayala was born on 2 February, 1975 in Saginaw, Michigan, U.S., is a State Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Ciruit Court of Florida. Discover Aramis Ayala's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is she in this year and how she spends money? Also learn how she earned most of networth at the age of 49 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
N/A |
Age |
49 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
Aquarius |
Born |
2 February 1975 |
Birthday |
2 February |
Birthplace |
Saginaw, Michigan, U.S. |
Nationality |
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 2 February.
She is a member of famous Attorney with the age 49 years old group.
Aramis Ayala Height, Weight & Measurements
At 49 years old, Aramis Ayala height not available right now. We will update Aramis Ayala's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Who Is Aramis Ayala's Husband?
Her husband is David Ayala
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Husband |
David Ayala |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Aramis Ayala Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Aramis Ayala worth at the age of 49 years old? Aramis Ayala’s income source is mostly from being a successful Attorney. She is from . We have estimated Aramis Ayala's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
Attorney |
Aramis Ayala Social Network
Timeline
Aramis Ayala (born February 2, 1975) is an American politician and prosecutor who was the state attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida.
She was elected in November 2016, and served as the chief prosecutor from 2017 to 2021.
In July 2017, a video of two police officers pulling over Ayala went viral, due to allegations of racial profiling.
Ayala requested the officers' information during the encounter, but did not take any legal action, writing that the stop "appears consistent with Florida law."
In May 2021, Ayala announced that she was running for Florida's 10th congressional district in 2022.
Initially considering a run for the U.S. Senate, she decided to run for Congress after incumbent U.S. Representative Val Demings announced she would run for United States Senate in 2022 against incumbent Republican Marco Rubio.
She later withdrew to run for Attorney General.
[[File:2022_Florida_attorney_general_election_results_map_by_county.svg|thumb|2022 Florida attorney general election results map by countyMap legend
{{legend|#e27f7f|Moody—50-60%}}
{{legend|#d75d5d|Moody—60-70%}}
{{legend|#d72f30|Moody—70-80%}}
{{legend|#c21b18|Moody—80-90%}}
{{legend|#a80000|Moody—>90%}}
{{legend|#7996e2|Ayala—50-60%}}]]
Incumbent Republican attorney general Ashley Moody ran for reelection, being challenged by Democrat Aramis Ayala, a former state attorney.
Moody defeated Ayala in the general election by a 20-point margin.
In May 2019, Ayala stated that she would not seek re-election as state attorney.
Ayala was born in Saginaw, Michigan, and graduated from the University of Michigan with an undergraduate degree.
She then obtained her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Detroit.
Ayala announced she would not seek capital punishment in any case, causing Florida Governor Rick Scott to reassign potential death penalty cases to another State Attorney.
Ayala has filed lawsuits disputing this action in the Supreme Court of Florida, and in federal court.
Ayala lost her Supreme Court case against Scott.
The Supreme Court of Florida (with one dissent) ruled against Ayala, saying that the governor was within his power to take cases away from Ayala because of her position to abandon the death penalty in all cases before her and not to exercise her discretion in each individual case.