Age, Biography and Wiki

Adrian Rigelsford was born on 1969 in Cambridge, United Kingdom, is an A 20th-century british male writer. Discover Adrian Rigelsford's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 55 years old?

Popular As N/A
Occupation N/A
Age 55 years old
Zodiac Sign N/A
Born
Birthday
Birthplace Cambridge, United Kingdom
Nationality United Kingdom

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on . He is a member of famous writer with the age 55 years old group.

Adrian Rigelsford Height, Weight & Measurements

At 55 years old, Adrian Rigelsford height not available right now. We will update Adrian Rigelsford's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Dating & Relationship status

He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.

Family
Parents Not Available
Wife Not Available
Sibling Not Available
Children Not Available

Adrian Rigelsford Net Worth

His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Adrian Rigelsford worth at the age of 55 years old? Adrian Rigelsford’s income source is mostly from being a successful writer. He is from United Kingdom. We have estimated Adrian Rigelsford's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2024 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2024 Under Review
Net Worth in 2023 Pending
Salary in 2023 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income writer

Adrian Rigelsford Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia Adrian Rigelsford Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

1969

Adrian Rigelsford (born 1969, in Cambridge) is a British writer and TV historian, most affiliated with Doctor Who.

His work has been subject to controversies over inaccuracies and theft.

1993

In 1993, he wrote the script for The Dark Dimension, a proposed 30th anniversary Doctor Who special.

BBC Enterprises supported the project and it was scheduled as a "straight-to-video" project, despite its very low budget.

The project eventually earned the backing of BBC1 Controller Alan Yentob, who agreed to invest in it and show the programme on BBC1.

However, the programme folded after 5 weeks of pre-production.

1998

He would return to scripting television again on the 1998 sci-fi series Space Island One.

2004

In June 2004, he was convicted of stealing photographs from the Daily Mail / Associated Newspapers archive in Kensington.

Rigelsford has written several articles and books on TV and film history.

Among them were ghost written biographies of Peter Sellers and Brian Blessed.

In 2004, Big Finish Productions produced the Rigelsford-written The Roof of the World as part of their main range Doctor Who audio plays.

It starred Peter Davison as the Fifth Doctor.

He was attached to write for the Lethbridge Stewart spin-off books, before being quietly dropped.

In June 2004, Rigelsford was convicted of stealing 56,000 photographs from the Daily Mail/Associated Newspapers research library over an eight-year period and reselling them for approximately £75,000.

Rigelsford was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment.

2012

He did contribute to the screenplay for the 2012 horror film The Seasoning House.

The accuracy of Rigelsford's reference work has been heavily disputed.

He was accused of unsourced and previously unheard-of quotes from William Hartnell, as well as the omission of an entire season from one of his Doctor Who reference works.

Later, a publication in TV Times of a "final" interview with director Stanley Kubrick brought Rigelsford to the attention of Anthony Frewin, a friend of Kubrick's. Frewin's investigation uncovered that a supposed tape of the Kubrick interview did not exist.

In the light of this and Frewin's expert doubts, TV Times ran an apology about the interview.