Age, Biography and Wiki
Abdul Hassan was born on 1974 in Guyana, is a Guyanese-born American lawyer (born 1974). Discover Abdul Hassan's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 50 years old?
Popular As |
N/A |
Occupation |
lawyer |
Age |
50 years old |
Zodiac Sign |
N/A |
Born |
|
Birthday |
|
Birthplace |
Guyana |
Nationality |
United States
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on .
He is a member of famous Lawyer with the age 50 years old group.
Abdul Hassan Height, Weight & Measurements
At 50 years old, Abdul Hassan height not available right now. We will update Abdul Hassan's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Wife |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Abdul Hassan Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Abdul Hassan worth at the age of 50 years old? Abdul Hassan’s income source is mostly from being a successful Lawyer. He is from United States. We have estimated Abdul Hassan's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
Lawyer |
Abdul Hassan Social Network
Timeline
Abdul Karim Hassan (born 1974) is a Guyanese-born American labor lawyer in Queens.
He is notable primarily for pursuing the right of a naturalized citizen to run for, and for himself declaring he will run for, president of the United States.
The argument that the 5th Amendment implicitly repealed the natural-born citizen requirement for the U.S. presidency has previously been advanced in a 2006 law review article by Paul A. Clark.
He thought that the national debt and budget deficit is the biggest threat to the United States.
However, he said "because the national debt and deficit are so large it is impossible to solve the deficit and debt problem with spending cuts and/or tax increases without destroying our way of life. The significant tax increases or spending cuts needed to solve the debt problem would have such a huge negative impact on our standard of living that any politician voting for such measures would be voted out of office."
Under his plan, all budget deficits will be funded by bonds purchased by the Federal Reserve Bank.
He said "We will no longer sell bonds to other countries or to Wall Street. If the Federal Reserve holds the bonds the interest paid on those bonds will come back to the United States Treasury instead of going to foreign countries and entities that would otherwise hold the debt."
On July 5, 2011, presidential candidate Abdul K. Hassan asked the United States Federal Election Committee to issue a ruling as to his rights and obligations under the various federal election laws including the Federal Election Campaign Act.
After an open meeting on September 1, 2011, during which the issues were intensely deliberated, the FEC unanimously voted (6-0) the next day.
The FEC ruled that he can run for president and can solicit and receive contributions.
The FEC also ruled that he is covered by FECA and is required to comply with the record-keeping, contribution and expenditure requirements of the FECA but that he is not eligible to receive matching funds.
In addition to seeking a ruling from the Federal Elections Commission, presidential candidate Abdul K. Hassan has asked the election authorities in several states for a ruling on whether he would be allowed presidential ballot access as a naturalized citizen.
The rulings were sought from the state authorities because even though the presidency is a federal office, ballot access in presidential elections is generally controlled by the states.
In 2012, he filed several lawsuits claiming that the natural-born-citizen clause violated the 5th and 14th Amendments, arguing it was a form of discrimination based on national origin.
He filed several lawsuits claiming that the natural-born-citizen clause violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.