Age, Biography and Wiki
Akira Hayashi was born on 16 September, 1974 in Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan, is a Japanese scholar-diplomat. Discover Akira Hayashi's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is he in this year and how he spends money? Also learn how he earned most of networth at the age of 114 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
Neo-Confucian scholar, academic, administrator, writer, diplomat |
| Age |
114 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Virgo |
| Born |
16 September, 1974 |
| Birthday |
16 September |
| Birthplace |
Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan |
| Date of death |
1859 |
| Died Place |
Edo |
| Nationality |
Japan
|
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 16 September.
He is a member of famous Swimmer with the age 114 years old group.
Akira Hayashi Height, Weight & Measurements
At 114 years old, Akira Hayashi height is 5′ 7″ and Weight 159 lbs.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
5′ 7″ |
| Weight |
159 lbs |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Wife |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Akira Hayashi Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2023-2024. So, how much is Akira Hayashi worth at the age of 114 years old? Akira Hayashi’s income source is mostly from being a successful Swimmer. He is from Japan. We have estimated Akira Hayashi's net worth, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2024 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2024 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2023 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
Swimmer |
Akira Hayashi Social Network
Timeline
Hayashi Akira (林 韑) (also known as Hayashi Fukusai) was an Edo period scholar-diplomat serving the Tokugawa shogunate in a variety of roles similar to those performed by serial Hayashi clan neo-Confucianists since the time of Tokugawa Ieyasu.
He was the hereditary Daigaku-no-kami descendant of Hayashi Razan, the first head of the Tokugawa shogunate's neo-Confucian academy in Edo, the Shōhei-kō (Yushima Seidō).
Hayashi Daigaku-no-kami Akira was a member of the Hayashi clan of Confucian scholars, each of whom were ad hoc personal advisers to the shōgun's prominent figures in the educational training system for the shogunal bureaucrats.
Akira assumed his role as rector of the academy in 1853; and his initial foray into diplomacy followed soon after.
Significantly, this would have been the first time the emperor's counsel was actively sought since the establishment of the Tokugawa shogunate.
The most easily identified consequence of this transitional overture would be the increased numbers of messengers which were constantly streaming back and forth between Tokyo and Kyoto during the next decade.
The Hayashi played a prominent role is helping to maintain the theoretical underpinnings of the Tokugawa regime; and Hayashi Daigaku-no-kami Akira was the 11th hereditary rector of Yushima Seidō.
The progenitor of this lineage of scholars was Hayashi Razan, who lived to witness his philosophical and pragmatic reasoning become a foundation for the dominant ideology of the bakufu until the end of the 19th century.
This evolution developed in part from the official Hayashi schema equating samurai with the cultured governing class (although the samurai were largely illiterate at the beginning of the Tokugawa shogunate).
The Hayashi helped to legitimize the role of the militaristic bakufu at the beginning of its existence.
His philosophy is also important in that it encouraged the samurai class to cultivate themselves, a trend which would become increasingly widespread over the course of his lifetime and beyond.
One of Razan's aphorism encapsulates this view:
There is no small irony in the fact that this 19th-century scholar/bureaucrat would find himself at a crucial nexus of managing political change—moving arguably "by the book" through uncharted waters with well-settled theories as the only guide.
